Calls for Palestinian Uprising from... Miami
On May 16, 2011, a group demonstrating across the street from the Israeli Consulate in Miami's Bayfront Park, called for an intifada, or spontaneous uprising, against Israel. The group tried hard to come across as peaceful, but some of what they were saying, and merely using a term such as "intifada" indicated that the group had anything but peaceful intentions.
"Third Intifada" was the name given to the rally. The term refers to a sequel of two previous violent uprisings -- not spontaneous at all, but carefully orchestrated -- that were perpetrated by Palestinians against Israelis. The last one took place in the year 2000; over 1000 Israelis were murdered.
The event coincided with other calls for a Palestinian intifada that emanated directly from the Middle East, from Palestinian neighborhoods.
Although in March a Facebook page calling for a third intifada was shut down amid complaints from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the page was resurrected when the Miami group took the terminology and logo from it and used it for its own Facebook page. That page – "Miami's Third Intifada Rally for Palestine" – is still up today.
In Miamai, heading the rally was Muhammed Malik, the former Executive Director of the South Florida chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).
CAIR is known for its many associations with Hamas – a group deemed a terrorist fgroup by both the US and Europe, was founded during the first intifada in 1987 – and this protest had its own Hamas imagery.
One of the other leaders of the event, Mnar Muhareb, the Past President of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) at Florida International University (FIU), donned a baseball cap bearing a logo resembling that of Hamas. Yet another, Farid Hamoudeh, wrapped his entire head in a keffiyeh (checkered headscarf), to resemble Palestinian militants in Gaza.
During the demonstration, protesters repeatedly chanted a slogan often used by Hamas and other Palestinian radicals calling for the destruction of Israel. It went: "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free." A girl dressed from head to toe in a black burqa, Flavia Marlene Almonte, held a sign saying the same.
As Hamas spokesman Mahmoud al-Zahar spelled out in January 2006, on al-Manar TV, "Palestine means Palestine in its entirety – from the [Mediterranean] Sea to the [Jordan] River, from Ras al-Naqura to Rafah. We cannot give up a single inch of it. Therefore, we will not recognize the Israeli enemy's [right] to a single inch."
Muharab wore a chain around her neck with a pendant depicting a map of the entire state of Israel.
The rally goers were also trying hard to appear and sound peaceful: they held a poster containing a peace emblem and invoked the name of Martin Luther King, who, ironically, said, "You know that Zionism is nothing less than the dream and ideal of the Jewish people returning to live in their own land….When people criticize Zionism, they mean Jews- this is God's own truth."
At previous demonstrations, such as at one in January 2009, in the same area in Miami, Muhammed Malik led a protest that had featured Nazi symbols, as well as acts of violence, which led to arrests against pro-Israel supporters
This time, they were a little more careful – but not careful enough to hide their true intent, beginning with the name of the rally, itself: "Third Intofada".
Beila Rabinowitz, Director of Militant Islam Monitor, contributed to this report.
Comment on this item
by Soeren Kern
Hamas would likely resort to violence to thwart any attempts to disarm the group. It is therefore highly unlikely the Europeans would confront Hamas in any meaningful way.
Spanish intelligence agents met secretly with Hezbollah operatives, who agreed to provide "escorts" to protect Spanish UNIFIL patrols. The quid pro quo was that Spanish troops would look the other way while Hezbollah was allowed to rearm for its next war with Israel. Hezbollah's message to Spain was: mind your own business.
If the European experience with Hezbollah in Lebanon is any indication, not only will Hamas not be disarmed, it will be rearmed as European monitors look on and do nothing.
What is clear is that European leaders have never been committed to honoring either the letter or the spirit of UN Resolutions 1559, 1680 and 1701, all of which were aimed at preventing Hezbollah from rearming.
by Debalina Ghoshal
According to former Bush administration official Stephen Rademaker, for the United States to respond to Russian violations of the treaty by pulling out of it would be "welcome in Moscow," which is "wrestling with the question of how they terminate [the treaty]" and thus, the United States should not make it easier for the Russians to leave.
by Guy Millière
Belgian security services have estimated that the number of European jihadists in Syria may be over 4000.
European leaders have directed their nastiest comments against the Jewish state, none of them has asked why Palestinian organizations in Gaza put their stockpiles of weapons in hospitals, homes, schools and mosques, or their command and control centers at the bottom of large apartment buildings or underneath hospitals. None of them has even said that Hamas is a terrorist organization despite its genocidal charter.
The majority of them are wedded to the idea of redistribution. Their policies are anti-growth, do not afford people any economic opportunity, and are what caused these economic crises in Europe in the first place. The United States seems to be following these thoroughly failed policies as well.
"Europe could not stay the same with a different population in it." — Christopher Caldwell, Reflections on the Revolution in Europe.
by Raymond Ibrahim
"I abducted your girls. I will sell them on the market, by Allah... There is a market for selling humans. Allah says I should sell." — Abubakar Shekau, leader of Boko Haram.
Hillary Clinton repeatedly refused to designate Boko Haram a terrorist organization.
In Malaysia -- regularly portrayed in the West as a moderate Muslim nation -- any attempt to promote religions other than Islam is illegal.
"The reason they want to kill me is very clear -- it is because of being a convert to Christianity." — Hassan Muwanguzi, Uganda.
by Dexter Van Zile
Rev. Hanna Massad does not mention that perhaps Hamas actually wants the blockade to end so it can bring in more weapons and cement to build attack-tunnels so it can "finish the job."
Hamas does not just admit to using human shields, it brags about using human shields. Why does Massad have to inject an air of uncertainty about Hamas's use of human shields when no such uncertainty exists?
The problem is that any self-respecting journalist would confront Massad with a follow-up question about Hamas's ideology and violence, but not the folks at Christianity Today.