Calls for Palestinian Uprising from... Miami
On May 16, 2011, a group demonstrating across the street from the Israeli Consulate in Miami's Bayfront Park, called for an intifada, or spontaneous uprising, against Israel. The group tried hard to come across as peaceful, but some of what they were saying, and merely using a term such as "intifada" indicated that the group had anything but peaceful intentions.
"Third Intifada" was the name given to the rally. The term refers to a sequel of two previous violent uprisings -- not spontaneous at all, but carefully orchestrated -- that were perpetrated by Palestinians against Israelis. The last one took place in the year 2000; over 1000 Israelis were murdered.
The event coincided with other calls for a Palestinian intifada that emanated directly from the Middle East, from Palestinian neighborhoods.
Although in March a Facebook page calling for a third intifada was shut down amid complaints from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the page was resurrected when the Miami group took the terminology and logo from it and used it for its own Facebook page. That page – "Miami's Third Intifada Rally for Palestine" – is still up today.
In Miamai, heading the rally was Muhammed Malik, the former Executive Director of the South Florida chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).
CAIR is known for its many associations with Hamas – a group deemed a terrorist fgroup by both the US and Europe, was founded during the first intifada in 1987 – and this protest had its own Hamas imagery.
One of the other leaders of the event, Mnar Muhareb, the Past President of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) at Florida International University (FIU), donned a baseball cap bearing a logo resembling that of Hamas. Yet another, Farid Hamoudeh, wrapped his entire head in a keffiyeh (checkered headscarf), to resemble Palestinian militants in Gaza.
During the demonstration, protesters repeatedly chanted a slogan often used by Hamas and other Palestinian radicals calling for the destruction of Israel. It went: "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free." A girl dressed from head to toe in a black burqa, Flavia Marlene Almonte, held a sign saying the same.
As Hamas spokesman Mahmoud al-Zahar spelled out in January 2006, on al-Manar TV, "Palestine means Palestine in its entirety – from the [Mediterranean] Sea to the [Jordan] River, from Ras al-Naqura to Rafah. We cannot give up a single inch of it. Therefore, we will not recognize the Israeli enemy's [right] to a single inch."
Muharab wore a chain around her neck with a pendant depicting a map of the entire state of Israel.
The rally goers were also trying hard to appear and sound peaceful: they held a poster containing a peace emblem and invoked the name of Martin Luther King, who, ironically, said, "You know that Zionism is nothing less than the dream and ideal of the Jewish people returning to live in their own land….When people criticize Zionism, they mean Jews- this is God's own truth."
At previous demonstrations, such as at one in January 2009, in the same area in Miami, Muhammed Malik led a protest that had featured Nazi symbols, as well as acts of violence, which led to arrests against pro-Israel supporters
This time, they were a little more careful – but not careful enough to hide their true intent, beginning with the name of the rally, itself: "Third Intofada".
Beila Rabinowitz, Director of Militant Islam Monitor, contributed to this report.
Comment on this item
by Burak Bekdil
Where Turkey stands today is a perfect example of how, when Islamists -- mild or otherwise -- rule a county, even the most basic liberties are systematically suppressed.
"A climate of fear has emerged in Turkey." — Hasam Kilic, President, Turkey's Constitutional Court.
The prosecutor demanded a heavier penalty for the victim than for her torturers.
The European Commission identified government interference in the judiciary and bans imposed on social media as the major sources of concern regarding Turkey's candidacy for full membership.
by Khaled Abu Toameh
To understand what drives a young Palestinian to carry out such a deadly attack, one needs to look at the statements of Palestinian Authority leaders during the past few weeks.
The anti-Israel campaign of incitement reached its peak with Abbas's speech at the UN a few weeks ago, when he accused Israel of waging a "war of genocide" in the Gaza Strip. Abbas made no reference to Hamas's crimes against both Israelis and Palestinians.
Whatever his motives, it is clear that the man who carried out the most recent attack, was influenced by the messages that Abbas and the Palestinian Authority leadership have been sending their people.
by Richard Kemp
Would General Allen -- or any other general today -- recommend contracting out his country's defenses if it were his country at stake? Of course not.
The Iranian regime remains dedicated to undermining and ultimately destroying the State of Israel. The Islamic State also has Israel in its sights and would certainly use the West Bank as a point from which to attack, if it were open to them.
There can be no two-state solution and no sovereign Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan, however desirable those things might be. The stark military reality is that Israel cannot withdraw its forces from the West Bank.
Fatah leaders ally themselves with the terrorists of Hamas, and, like Hamas, they continue to reject the every existence of the State of Israel.
If Western leaders actually want to help, they should use all diplomatic and economic means to make it clear to the Palestinians that they will never achieve an independent and sovereign state while they remain set on the destruction of the State of Israel.
by Louis René Beres
The Palestine Liberation Organization [PLO], forerunner of today's Palestinian Authority, was founded in 1964, three years before Israel came into the unintended control of the West Bank and Gaza. What therefore was the PLO planning to "liberate"?
Why does no one expect the Palestinians to cease all deliberate and random violence against Israeli civilians before being considered for admission to statehood?
On June 30, 1922, a joint resolution of both Houses of Congress of the United States endorsed a "Mandate for Palestine," confirming the right of Jews to settle anywhere they chose between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. This is the core American legacy of support for a Jewish State that President Obama now somehow fails to recall.
A sovereign state of Palestine, as identified by the Arabs -- a Muslim land occupied by "Palestinian" Arabs -- has never existed; not before 1948, and not before 1967. From the start, it was, and continues to be, the Arab states -- not Israel -- that became the core impediment to Palestinian sovereignty.
by Timon Dias
It looks as if this new law is meant to serve as a severe roadblock to parties that would like to dismantle the EU in a democratic and peaceful way from within.
A rather dull semantic trick pro-EU figures usually apply, is calling their opponents "anti-Europe."