Saudi Arabia Gets a Pass
The Saudis have been spared. Shamefully, President Obama did not even mention Saudi Arabia in his speech last week when he called for democratization in the Middle East. The theocrats who rule the Kingdom have done as much as they can to quash Middle East freedom movements: they have sent troops to crush protesting Bahrainis, and in January, they welcomed exiled Tunisian president Zine al-Abedine Ben Ali.
The same day as the recent arrest and jailing of a 32 year-old woman for driving a car, Wikileaks released a U.S. diplomatic cable which disclosed that Islamic charities from Saudi Arabia and the UAE financed a Pakistani terrorist network that recruited children to wage jihad. The estimated amount of support was about $100 million a year.
The latest example of the incoherence of current U.S. Middle East Policy involves Manal al-Sharif, a Saudi woman who had the courage to post a video of herself on YouTube driving a car. There is no actual law in Saudi banning women from driving, which is not mentioned in the Koran and therefore not a prohibition based on religion; but it is de facto illegal because several fatwas were issued to that effect. Some Saudi leaders have expressed support for ditching the ban, but they have taken no concrete action. In January 2008, according to The Telelgraph, "Government officials have confirmed, the landmark decision [to lift the ban on women drivers] and plan to issue a decree by the end of the year."We will make an announcement soon," they were quoted as having said. "Soon" was four years ago.
Manal, who works at Saudi Aramco, the state-owned oil giant, claims she left work late. She says no male-driven taxis or family members were available to take her home, as is the usual practice (public transportation for women is off limits because of gender-segregation laws). The video, still available on YouTube, shows Manal talking behind the wheel about why women need the right to drive. "If a husband has a heart attack, what is a wife to do if there is no one else around and she cannot drive?" she asks.
For committing this "crime," Manal now finds herself in jail, charged with "besmirching the kingdom's reputation abroad and stirring up public opinion."
The Western media is taking notice. Saudi women have flocked to the Internet to organize a "women2drive" protest, calling on women around the Kingdom to hop in a car and drive on June 17. If it works, it is likely to become an important act of civil disobedience in the Kingdom.
Maybe – one hopes -- these stories story mean they will no longer be able to violate human rights with impunity.
Like Egypt's Hosni Mubarak, Saudi King Abdullah has chosen to pay lip-service to reform without taking any bold steps. He has appointed a woman a cabinet minister, yet continues to deny women the right to vote. He has encouraged women to get an education and work, but denies them right to drive and co-mingle with men in work environments. The glaring contradictions inherent in these tepid "reforms" are evident to all. And now that Saudi's rulers have blinked, people like Manal are predictably -– and rightly -– demanding more.
If America would show a bit more enthusiasm for these dissidents, perhaps it would spur them to be even bolder. Obama blames resentment of the U.S. on the perception that America pursues its own interests at the expense of others. He is wrong. What grates is watching America display such rank hypocrisy by calling out and threatening serial rights abusers like Iran, Libya and Iraq under Saddam, but staying silent on others such as the Saudis.
The timing of this international media embarrassment could not be worse for the Kingdom.
Turning a blind eye toward the Saudis has been American policy for decades. Events, however, are now starting to outpace U.S. foreign policy, just as they did in Egypt and Libya. A repeat in Saudi Arabia of these recent mistakes only highlights to the people in the region what values the US actually support.
Comment on this item
by Burak Bekdil
Where Turkey stands today is a perfect example of how, when Islamists -- mild or otherwise -- rule a county, even the most basic liberties are systematically suppressed.
"A climate of fear has emerged in Turkey." — Hasam Kilic, President, Turkey's Constitutional Court.
The prosecutor demanded a heavier penalty for the victim than for her torturers.
The European Commission identified government interference in the judiciary and bans imposed on social media as the major sources of concern regarding Turkey's candidacy for full membership.
by Khaled Abu Toameh
To understand what drives a young Palestinian to carry out such a deadly attack, one needs to look at the statements of Palestinian Authority leaders during the past few weeks.
The anti-Israel campaign of incitement reached its peak with Abbas's speech at the UN a few weeks ago, when he accused Israel of waging a "war of genocide" in the Gaza Strip. Abbas made no reference to Hamas's crimes against both Israelis and Palestinians.
Whatever his motives, it is clear that the man who carried out the most recent attack, was influenced by the messages that Abbas and the Palestinian Authority leadership have been sending their people.
by Richard Kemp
Would General Allen -- or any other general today -- recommend contracting out his country's defenses if it were his country at stake? Of course not.
The Iranian regime remains dedicated to undermining and ultimately destroying the State of Israel. The Islamic State also has Israel in its sights and would certainly use the West Bank as a point from which to attack, if it were open to them.
There can be no two-state solution and no sovereign Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan, however desirable those things might be. The stark military reality is that Israel cannot withdraw its forces from the West Bank.
Fatah leaders ally themselves with the terrorists of Hamas, and, like Hamas, they continue to reject the every existence of the State of Israel.
If Western leaders actually want to help, they should use all diplomatic and economic means to make it clear to the Palestinians that they will never achieve an independent and sovereign state while they remain set on the destruction of the State of Israel.
by Louis René Beres
The Palestine Liberation Organization [PLO], forerunner of today's Palestinian Authority, was founded in 1964, three years before Israel came into the unintended control of the West Bank and Gaza. What therefore was the PLO planning to "liberate"?
Why does no one expect the Palestinians to cease all deliberate and random violence against Israeli civilians before being considered for admission to statehood?
On June 30, 1922, a joint resolution of both Houses of Congress of the United States endorsed a "Mandate for Palestine," confirming the right of Jews to settle anywhere they chose between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. This is the core American legacy of support for a Jewish State that President Obama now somehow fails to recall.
A sovereign state of Palestine, as identified by the Arabs -- a Muslim land occupied by "Palestinian" Arabs -- has never existed; not before 1948, and not before 1967. From the start, it was, and continues to be, the Arab states -- not Israel -- that became the core impediment to Palestinian sovereignty.
by Timon Dias
It looks as if this new law is meant to serve as a severe roadblock to parties that would like to dismantle the EU in a democratic and peaceful way from within.
A rather dull semantic trick pro-EU figures usually apply, is calling their opponents "anti-Europe."