Islamic Countries Reject Monitor for Discrimination Against Women
During the Annual Full-day Meeting on Women's Human Rights held last week at
the Human Rights Council, the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC)
and member states expressed their opposition to the idea of setting up a new
Special Rapporteur who would monitor laws that discriminate against women.
According to the High Commissioner for Human Rights, the establishment of
this new mechanism has been under consideration since 2005 and is supported
by both the Secretary-General and the Office of the High Commissioner for
Human Rights (OHCHR). Active OIC opposition - common on all human rights
fronts at the UN - introduces a major impediment to realizing this idea for
the better protection of women's rights.
Pakistan, speaking on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference
(OIC), "disagreed" with the proposal because "The solitary focus of this
mandate would lead to more polemics that surround contemporary discussions
on issues such as universality versus respect of cultural, legal and
religious diversities. It would also lead to further polarization in the
system as it may be perceived as against certain regional and religious
groups. The OIC believes that the international community needs to be
afforded ample time and opportunity with full respect to cultural diversity
and better coordination of existing standards to graduate to
Egypt "did not favor" this idea..."It will lead to unnecessary duplication
and waste of resources. No single individual would be able to follow laws on
all countries and have knowledge of different legal systems in the various
parts of the world, let alone apply common yardstick to evaluate them. This
might lead to polarization and politicization because some groups might feel
Algeria argued that, "we shouldn't lose sight of the importance of taking
into account national and regional special characteristics and historical
and religious diversity. We must insure there is no proliferation of
mechanisms on the subject."
At the end of the debate, Iran suggested a "remedy" for violence against
women: "National and regional particularities as well as various cultural
historical and cultural background should be taken into account in an
appropriate manner. I would like to emphasize the role of chastity on
strengthening crime prevention to eliminate violence against women and girl
Why the opposition to close monitoring of laws that discriminate against
In Pakistan rape is frequent, prosecutions are rare and there is no specific
legislation prohibiting domestic violence.
In Egypt, spousal rape is not illegal and the law does not prohibit domestic
violence or spousal abuse. The law requires any kind of assault victim to
produce multiple eyewitnesses, a difficult condition for a domestic abuse
victim to meet. The law does not specifically address honor crimes.
In Algeria, spousal rape is not illegal and the penal code [which is
applicable in domestic violence cases] states that a person must be
incapacitated for 15 days or more and present a doctor's note certifying the
injuries before filing charges for battery.
In Iran, the constitution bars women from becoming president or serving as
supreme leader or as certain types of judges. Adultery is a capital offense
punishable by stoning. Spousal rape is not illegal and domestic violence is
not specifically prohibited by law.
Comment on this item
by Alan M. Dershowitz
by Louis René Beres
Jihadi violence serves not only to advance the terrorist's delusion of immortality, but also to add, however perversely, an apparent and desperately needed erotic satisfaction, using religion as the justification.
Persuasive promises of immortality -- the desperate hope to live forever -- underlie virtually all major religions.
Washington and Jerusalem should finally address what needs to be done in addition to military remediation -- reinforcing efforts to convince these terrorists that their expected martyrdom is ultimately just an elaborate fiction.
by Gill Gillespie and Shabnam Assadollahi
The aim of the current Iranian regime is clearly to acquire a nuclear weapons capability and to retain as much territory in Iraq as possible under Shia Islamist rule, whatever the human cost. Those aims are also the reason Iran's regime is now trying to intervene in Iraq.
Iran will doubtless be demanding that any cooperation with the West be compensated for by "concessions" permitting its nuclear weapons program.
Involving Iran in Iraq at this point will merely alienate any Sunni allies whose assistance is much needed to defeat IS.
Many people inside Iran have alerted the U.S. Administration for over two years about other industrial facilities being secretly built in Iran and not declared to the International Atomic Energy. So far, all intelligence from within Iran has been wilfully ignored by the Obama Administration.
by Burak Bekdil
The Turkish government "frankly worked" with the al-Nusrah Front, the al-Qaeda affiliate in Syria, along with other terrorist groups.
The Financial Task Force, an international body setting the standards for combating terrorist financing, ruled that Turkey should remain in its "gray list."
While NATO wishes to reinforce its outreach to democracies such as Australia and Japan, Turkey is trying to forge wider partnerships with the Arab world, Russia, China, Central Asia, China, Africa and -- and with a bunch of terrorist organizations, including Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood, Ahrar al-Sham and the al-Nusrah Front.
Being NATO's only Muslim member was fine. Being NATO's only Islamist member ideologically attached to the Muslim Brotherhood is quite another thing.
by Samuel Westrop
British politicians seem to be trapped in an endless debate over how to curb both violent and non-violent extremism within the Muslim community.
A truly useful measure might be to end the provision of state funding and legitimacy to terror-linked extremist charities.