Islamic Countries Reject Monitor for Discrimination Against Women
During the Annual Full-day Meeting on Women's Human Rights held last week at
the Human Rights Council, the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC)
and member states expressed their opposition to the idea of setting up a new
Special Rapporteur who would monitor laws that discriminate against women.
According to the High Commissioner for Human Rights, the establishment of
this new mechanism has been under consideration since 2005 and is supported
by both the Secretary-General and the Office of the High Commissioner for
Human Rights (OHCHR). Active OIC opposition - common on all human rights
fronts at the UN - introduces a major impediment to realizing this idea for
the better protection of women's rights.
Pakistan, speaking on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference
(OIC), "disagreed" with the proposal because "The solitary focus of this
mandate would lead to more polemics that surround contemporary discussions
on issues such as universality versus respect of cultural, legal and
religious diversities. It would also lead to further polarization in the
system as it may be perceived as against certain regional and religious
groups. The OIC believes that the international community needs to be
afforded ample time and opportunity with full respect to cultural diversity
and better coordination of existing standards to graduate to
Egypt "did not favor" this idea..."It will lead to unnecessary duplication
and waste of resources. No single individual would be able to follow laws on
all countries and have knowledge of different legal systems in the various
parts of the world, let alone apply common yardstick to evaluate them. This
might lead to polarization and politicization because some groups might feel
Algeria argued that, "we shouldn't lose sight of the importance of taking
into account national and regional special characteristics and historical
and religious diversity. We must insure there is no proliferation of
mechanisms on the subject."
At the end of the debate, Iran suggested a "remedy" for violence against
women: "National and regional particularities as well as various cultural
historical and cultural background should be taken into account in an
appropriate manner. I would like to emphasize the role of chastity on
strengthening crime prevention to eliminate violence against women and girl
Why the opposition to close monitoring of laws that discriminate against
In Pakistan rape is frequent, prosecutions are rare and there is no specific
legislation prohibiting domestic violence.
In Egypt, spousal rape is not illegal and the law does not prohibit domestic
violence or spousal abuse. The law requires any kind of assault victim to
produce multiple eyewitnesses, a difficult condition for a domestic abuse
victim to meet. The law does not specifically address honor crimes.
In Algeria, spousal rape is not illegal and the penal code [which is
applicable in domestic violence cases] states that a person must be
incapacitated for 15 days or more and present a doctor's note certifying the
injuries before filing charges for battery.
In Iran, the constitution bars women from becoming president or serving as
supreme leader or as certain types of judges. Adultery is a capital offense
punishable by stoning. Spousal rape is not illegal and domestic violence is
not specifically prohibited by law.
Comment on this item
by Soeren Kern
Hamas would likely resort to violence to thwart any attempts to disarm the group. It is therefore highly unlikely the Europeans would confront Hamas in any meaningful way.
Spanish intelligence agents met secretly with Hezbollah operatives, who agreed to provide "escorts" to protect Spanish UNIFIL patrols. The quid pro quo was that Spanish troops would look the other way while Hezbollah was allowed to rearm for its next war with Israel. Hezbollah's message to Spain was: mind your own business.
If the European experience with Hezbollah in Lebanon is any indication, not only will Hamas not be disarmed, it will be rearmed as European monitors look on and do nothing.
What is clear is that European leaders have never been committed to honoring either the letter or the spirit of UN Resolutions 1559, 1680 and 1701, all of which were aimed at preventing Hezbollah from rearming.
by Debalina Ghoshal
According to former Bush administration official Stephen Rademaker, for the United States to respond to Russian violations of the treaty by pulling out of it would be "welcome in Moscow," which is "wrestling with the question of how they terminate [the treaty]" and thus, the United States should not make it easier for the Russians to leave.
by Guy Millière
Belgian security services have estimated that the number of European jihadists in Syria may be over 4000.
European leaders have directed their nastiest comments against the Jewish state, none of them has asked why Palestinian organizations in Gaza put their stockpiles of weapons in hospitals, homes, schools and mosques, or their command and control centers at the bottom of large apartment buildings or underneath hospitals. None of them has even said that Hamas is a terrorist organization despite its genocidal charter.
The majority of them are wedded to the idea of redistribution. Their policies are anti-growth, do not afford people any economic opportunity, and are what caused these economic crises in Europe in the first place. The United States seems to be following these thoroughly failed policies as well.
"Europe could not stay the same with a different population in it." — Christopher Caldwell, Reflections on the Revolution in Europe.
by Raymond Ibrahim
"I abducted your girls. I will sell them on the market, by Allah... There is a market for selling humans. Allah says I should sell." — Abubakar Shekau, leader of Boko Haram.
Hillary Clinton repeatedly refused to designate Boko Haram a terrorist organization.
In Malaysia -- regularly portrayed in the West as a moderate Muslim nation -- any attempt to promote religions other than Islam is illegal.
"The reason they want to kill me is very clear -- it is because of being a convert to Christianity." — Hassan Muwanguzi, Uganda.
by Dexter Van Zile
Rev. Hanna Massad does not mention that perhaps Hamas actually wants the blockade to end so it can bring in more weapons and cement to build attack-tunnels so it can "finish the job."
Hamas does not just admit to using human shields, it brags about using human shields. Why does Massad have to inject an air of uncertainty about Hamas's use of human shields when no such uncertainty exists?
The problem is that any self-respecting journalist would confront Massad with a follow-up question about Hamas's ideology and violence, but not the folks at Christianity Today.