Saudi Arabia: Women As Prisoners
The outstanding women’s rights activist, Wajeha Al-Huwaider, has launched a new campaign against the guardianship system that is imposed on Saudi women.
She has been trying to leave the country by crossing the King Fahad Causeway, which connects Saudi Arabia with Bahrain -- without permission from a male relative. She has already attempted this three times. All three attempts have failed. The last one took place on June 25th. She was held in the causeway passport office for more than four hours. She said she will try again later this week.
The Saudi guardianship system gives men total control over women’s lives. The system treats women as juveniles. In essence, women cannot function without a male guardian’s permission. Under this system, Saudi women are not allowed to get married, get divorced, study, work, travel, receive medical care or even leave the house unless they have approval from a male relative.
If a school telephones to say a child is sick, its mother may not go to the school.
Al-Huwaider is asking the Saudi government to remove these restrictions on women’s lives by cancelling the guardianship system. She wants women to be treated as responsible citizens, as are men.
Her plan is to continue to go every weekend until she is allowed across the border, and she is asking other women to join in this fight for change.
Every day, Al-Huwaider sends out text messages asking women to go to any border to try to cross it without permission from their male relatives.
Recently, Sarah Meshfi, a journalist from Abha, tried to go to the local airport in response to Al-Huwaider’s calls. Meshfi was stopped by her uncle in the middle of the road before she even reached the airport grounds. Meshfi said she would try again.
Al-Huwaider hopes that by bringing attention to the struggle against this restrictive guardianship system, Saudi women might soon be able to control their own lives.
“Either you treat us as responsible adults or let us leave the country,” she said. “Please let everybody know about our struggle to gain our lives back.”
Comment on this item
by Khaled Abu Toameh
To understand what drives a young Palestinian to carry out such a deadly attack, one needs to look at the statements of Palestinian Authority leaders during the past few weeks.
The anti-Israel campaign of incitement reached its peak with Abbas's speech at the UN a few weeks ago, when he accused Israel of waging a "war of genocide" in the Gaza Strip. Abbas made no reference to Hamas's crimes against both Israelis and Palestinians.
Whatever his motives, it is clear that the man who carried out the most recent attack, was influenced by the messages that Abbas and the Palestinian Authority leadership have been sending their people.
by Richard Kemp
Would General Allen -- or any other general today -- recommend contracting out his country's defenses if it were his country at stake? Of course not.
The Iranian regime remains dedicated to undermining and ultimately destroying the State of Israel. The Islamic State also has Israel in its sights and would certainly use the West Bank as a point from which to attack, if it were open to them.
There can be no two-state solution and no sovereign Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan, however desirable those things might be. The stark military reality is that Israel cannot withdraw its forces from the West Bank.
Fatah leaders ally themselves with the terrorists of Hamas, and, like Hamas, they continue to reject the every existence of the State of Israel.
If Western leaders actually want to help, they should use all diplomatic and economic means to make it clear to the Palestinians that they will never achieve an independent and sovereign state while they remain set on the destruction of the State of Israel.
by Louis René Beres
The Palestine Liberation Organization [PLO], forerunner of today's Palestinian Authority, was founded in 1964, three years before Israel came into the unintended control of the West Bank and Gaza. What therefore was the PLO planning to "liberate"?
Why does no one expect the Palestinians to cease all deliberate and random violence against Israeli civilians before being considered for admission to statehood?
On June 30, 1922, a joint resolution of both Houses of Congress of the United States endorsed a "Mandate for Palestine," confirming the right of Jews to settle anywhere they chose between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. This is the core American legacy of support for a Jewish State that President Obama now somehow fails to recall.
A sovereign state of Palestine, as identified by the Arabs -- a Muslim land occupied by "Palestinian" Arabs -- has never existed; not before 1948, and not before 1967. From the start, it was, and continues to be, the Arab states -- not Israel -- that became the core impediment to Palestinian sovereignty.
by Timon Dias
It looks as if this new law is meant to serve as a severe roadblock to parties that would like to dismantle the EU in a democratic and peaceful way from within.
A rather dull semantic trick pro-EU figures usually apply, is calling their opponents "anti-Europe."
by Alan M. Dershowitz