No more mosques
Reader comment on: London Rejects Plan for Mega-Mosque
Submitted by Rajesh, Dec 11, 2012 10:43
No more mosques in Europe/the US unless they allow widespread construction of churches, temples, etc, in Saudi Arabia and every other Muslim country. No more hypocrisy, and no more construction of large mosques while people are dying in developing countries. Have some shame before you go out and construct a mosque in a European country.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. This site reserves the right to reject anything found to be objectionable.
Other reader comments on this item
|How dare they threaten! [75 words]||Margaret Davenport||Dec 12, 2012 08:15|
|↔ We don't want you [74 words]||Jordan||Dec 16, 2012 12:08|
|Believe what you like but please do it at home [127 words]||John Morton||Dec 12, 2012 08:04|
|Great [12 words]||Emanuel||Dec 12, 2012 06:33|
|Plan to establish Sharia-controlled enclave in East London? [29 words]||Peter Saunders||Dec 12, 2012 02:06|
|Good for London [55 words]||Cary Greenberg||Dec 11, 2012 16:23|
|I don't get it [15 words]||Lauren||Dec 11, 2012 16:18|
|Mego-Mosque for Mega-Mosqueteers [12 words]||Docky Wocky||Dec 11, 2012 16:13|
|Good news! [21 words]||Khushi||Dec 11, 2012 11:27|
|⇒ No more mosques [55 words]||Rajesh||Dec 11, 2012 10:43|
|↔ Victory for Infidels [120 words]||Valhalla||Dec 11, 2012 17:30|
|↔ Agree [67 words]||Plumbird||Dec 26, 2012 22:04|
Comment on this item
by Alan M. Dershowitz
by Lawrence A. Franklin
There is no change in U.S policy toward Israel that will win any true allies in the Middle East, despite what Arab leaders claim. They often assert that if only we would solve the Palestinian-Israeli problem first, relations would improve. This is a tactic. These leaders employ it simply to divert Western officials from making demands on them, instead of on Israel. The reality is that most Arabs view the U.S., its European allies and Israel with ineradicable contempt.
by Alan M. Dershowitz
by Pierre Rehov
For terrorists, the death of innocent children is irrelevant. In a society that promotes martyrdom as the ultimate sign of success, the death of innocent children can sometimes even be seen as a public relations blessing.
In every action, intent is paramount. There should never be a moral equivalence painted between the deliberate killing of civilians, and a retaliation that tragically leads to casualties among civilians.
There is, however, one small difference: in the Middle East, reporters are threatened, except in Israel. Their choice becomes a simple one: promote the Palestinian point of view or stop working in the West Bank. Keep the eye of the camera dirty or lose your job. This show should not go on.
by Khaled Abu Toameh
Since 1948, the Arab countries and government have been paying mostly lip service to the Palestinians.
"They have money and oil, but don't care about the Palestinians, even though we are Arabs and Muslims like them. What a Saudi or Qatari sheikh spends in one night in London, Paris or Las Vegas could solve the problem of tens of thousands of Palestinians." — Palestinian human rights activist.
"Some Arabs were hoping that Israel would rid them of Hamas." — Ashraf Salameh, Gaza City.
"Some of the Arab regimes are interested in getting rid of the resistance in order to remove the burden of the Palestinian cause, which threatens the stability of their regimes." — Mustafa al-Sawwaf, Palestinian political analyst.
"Most Arabs are busy these days with bloody battles waged by their leaders, who are struggling to survive. These battles are raging in Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Egypt, Libya and the Palestinian Authority." — Mohammed al-Musafer, columnist.
"The Arab leaders don't know what they want from the Gaza Strip. They don't even know what they want from Israel." — Yusef Rizka, Hamas official.