Islamophobia: The reason Hillary Clinton had to go
Reader comment on: Canada: Parliament Condemns Free Speech
Submitted by El Cid, Nov 10, 2016 14:01
The ONE issue that made Trump imperative for the West is his willingness to confront the political correct speech surrounding Islam.
When the Canadian parliament would be better served to recognize the profound intellectual achievements of a Muslim like salman rushdie, instead they embrace a Jihadist agenda.
Those of us who have studied Islam can easily recognize the 'soft' Jihadist tactics, such as the recent vote in Canada. I would go so far to say that Stephen Harper was the moral leader of the western world, and lost his support over the 'burka' / citizenship oath issue. His principled stance was considered "Islamophobia" by those who simplistically saw the issue as one of religious freedom rather than the preservation of Canadian democracy, free speech, and tolerance. Imagine someone wearing a KKK hood in a citizenship oath ceremony and calling it a religious right. What's the difference?
Ms. Clinton was an enabler of soft Jihad. For example, she supported the OIS's revisions to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to include insulting Islam as a human rights violation.
Let us pay that Mr. Trump will NOT stand down on this important issue. The continued existence of the free world depends on it. The Jihadists will not stand down, and they are very, very patient.
Note: Reader comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. Gatestone Institute reserves the right to reject anything found to be objectionable. Reader comments, including the one above, represent solely the opinion or viewpoint of the readers that submitted them and do not represent the opinion or viewpoint of Gatestone Institute. Gatestone Institute takes no responsibility for the content of reader comments.
Other reader comments on this item
Comment on this item
Get Free Exclusive Gatestone Content: