Wahhabi Vandalism In Morocco and Tunisia
Where are the protests form the media, from the United Nations and UNESCO, from the so-called human rights groups, from the historical preservation societies?
Radical Islamist vandalism of irreplaceable cultural patrimony – including the legacy of Muhammad and other prominent early Muslims – continues, following recent attacks by Saudi-inspired Wahhabis, known incorrectly as "Salafis," on spiritual Sufi monuments in Egypt, Libya, and Mali. In the past, Wahhabi despoliation has included devastation of the cemeteries where lay the remains of the family and companions of Muhammad, as well as countless distinguished figures in the ensuing 1,300 years of Islamic history.
The bombing of the Bamiyan Buddha statues in Afghanistan by the Taliban and Al-Qaida in 2001 was perceived by non-Muslims as shocking, but as no more than an assertion of extremist Muslim supremacy. Moderate Muslims have a greater understanding of the perversity and danger of such depredations. Wahhabis and other fundamentalists like them have accumulated a long catalogue of desecration and plunder – predominantly at Islamic locations.
The grave Sidi al-Suwayri, Libya.
Such twisted beliefs are relatively new; they only appeared in the mainstream of Muslim thought 250 years ago. Non-Muslims predictably find this destructive frenzy incomprehensible; it is probably for this reason that few non-Muslims realize that the majority of victims of Islamist terrorism are so far Muslims.
Wahhabi-Saudi wrecking and pillaging of Muslim cultural treasures was first noticed at the end of the 18th century after they erupted from central Arabia into Iraq. They sacked and looted the tomb of Imam Husayn, the grandson of Muhammad, in the Shia Muslim holy city of Karbala, and besieged Najaf, the location of the shrine of Imam Ali, the cousin and son-in-law of Muhammad, and progenitor of Shi'ism. But they failed to conquer Najaf.
They then headed south and west to the Hejaz district of Arabia, which includes Mecca and Medina. There, in the early 19th century, they killed and destroyed every person and thing of which they disapproved. They robbed their way across the landscape, seizing the rich treasures presented for centuries to the mausoleum of Prophet Muhammad at the Prophet's Shrine in Medina.
For a time, they were driven out of Mecca and Medina by the Ottomans, but after the House of Saud and the Wahhabi sect retook the Islamic holy cities in 1924-25, they again set about, with considerable determination, eliminating the most honored graveyards, houses, and mosques associated with Muhammad.
The Wahhabis turned the building in Mecca where Muhammad was born into a cattle market, then a library. The grave of Muhammad's mother, Amina Bint Wahb, was bulldozed, soaked with gasoline and repeatedly set afire. The home of Khadija, the first wife of Muhammad, in which five of his children were born, was covered with sand and later by public toilets – a grotesque act intended to discourage Muslims from praying there, as Islam does not permit worship (of Allah alone – not Muhammad, his wives, or his offspring) in a place where the odors of human waste are present.
Wahhabi wrecking crews have also torn down historic mosques in Medina, and Wahhabi terrorist acolytes have bombed Sufi and Shia structures in Iraq and South Asia. The Wahhabi fanatics even tried to destroy the Ka'bah, the cubical building inside the Grand Mosque at Mecca; and they still threaten to remove the green dome from the Prophet's Shrine in Medina. If their malign fantasies were fulfilled, they would take the body of Muhammad out of the Shrine and dump it in an unmarked grave. They shrugged with indifference at the loss of exquisite Ottoman mosques during the Balkan Wars of the 1990s. They would gleefully level the Taj Mahal. They would not hesitate to blow up the Egyptian Pyramids and Babylonian palaces and temples. They would tear down the Great Wall of China. They would reduce the pre-Columbian temples of Mexico, Central, and South America to rubble, or any other pre-Islamic structures.
The Wahhabi assault on the legendary, beloved Islamic center of Timbuktu in Mali, during July of this year, was probably their most surprising recent offense. They have now reached Morocco, however, the pearl of Sufism, and one of the outstanding sources of Islamic civilization. As reported by BBC News on October 18, Wahhabis have eradicated pre-Islamic stone carvings in the High Atlas mountains, dated at 8,000 years before the present, and depicting the sun as a god. These petroglyphs were created before the arrival of the Phoenicians in the territory.
Leaders of the Berber Amazigh people who live in the area, south of Marrakesh, trace the ravaging of the incised stones to Wahhabi penetration of the Berber zone of Mali and their subsequent infiltration into Morocco. The local inhabitants report that the Wahhabis claim the survival of any pre-Islamic art, architecture, or other antiquities denies the Muslim conquest of the land. In this way, they most resemble those who shelled the Bamiyan Buddhas with dynamite and anti-aircraft weapons.
The shrine of Aisha Manoubia, in Tunisia, before being burned down.
Where are protests by the media? Where are the protests from the United Nations and UNESCO? Where are protests by so-called human rights groups? Where are protests by historical preservation societies? The Wahhabi effort to halt their marauding across North Africa would best be led by traditional Muslims as well as local officials, but with the loud, vocal, unceasing support of international personalities and bodies who, at the moment, merely claim they are committed to the preservation of "world heritage sites." This unchecked Wahhabi rampage must be stopped.
Reader comments on this item
|Very nicely written piece [44 words]||Enzo||Oct 24, 2013 22:25|
|Where is the outrage? [53 words]||Cate Dixon||Nov 9, 2012 16:24|
|Islam is Islam [52 words]||Newspaniard||Nov 7, 2012 03:39|
|Historical sites [67 words]||Mike||Nov 5, 2012 16:11|
|Wahhabi intolerance [90 words]||Stephen||Nov 5, 2012 11:31|
Comment on this item
by Khaled Abu Toameh
To understand what drives a young Palestinian to carry out such a deadly attack, one needs to look at the statements of Palestinian Authority leaders during the past few weeks.
The anti-Israel campaign of incitement reached its peak with Abbas's speech at the UN a few weeks ago, when he accused Israel of waging a "war of genocide" in the Gaza Strip. Abbas made no reference to Hamas's crimes against both Israelis and Palestinians.
Whatever his motives, it is clear that the man who carried out the most recent attack, was influenced by the messages that Abbas and the Palestinian Authority leadership have been sending their people.
by Richard Kemp
Would General Allen -- or any other general today -- recommend contracting out his country's defenses if it were his country at stake? Of course not.
The Iranian regime remains dedicated to undermining and ultimately destroying the State of Israel. The Islamic State also has Israel in its sights and would certainly use the West Bank as a point from which to attack, if it were open to them.
There can be no two-state solution and no sovereign Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan, however desirable those things might be. The stark military reality is that Israel cannot withdraw its forces from the West Bank.
Fatah leaders ally themselves with the terrorists of Hamas, and, like Hamas, they continue to reject the every existence of the State of Israel.
If Western leaders actually want to help, they should use all diplomatic and economic means to make it clear to the Palestinians that they will never achieve an independent and sovereign state while they remain set on the destruction of the State of Israel.
by Louis René Beres
The Palestine Liberation Organization [PLO], forerunner of today's Palestinian Authority, was founded in 1964, three years before Israel came into the unintended control of the West Bank and Gaza. What therefore was the PLO planning to "liberate"?
Why does no one expect the Palestinians to cease all deliberate and random violence against Israeli civilians before being considered for admission to statehood?
On June 30, 1922, a joint resolution of both Houses of Congress of the United States endorsed a "Mandate for Palestine," confirming the right of Jews to settle anywhere they chose between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. This is the core American legacy of support for a Jewish State that President Obama now somehow fails to recall.
A sovereign state of Palestine, as identified by the Arabs -- a Muslim land occupied by "Palestinian" Arabs -- has never existed; not before 1948, and not before 1967. From the start, it was, and continues to be, the Arab states -- not Israel -- that became the core impediment to Palestinian sovereignty.
by Timon Dias
It looks as if this new law is meant to serve as a severe roadblock to parties that would like to dismantle the EU in a democratic and peaceful way from within.
A rather dull semantic trick pro-EU figures usually apply, is calling their opponents "anti-Europe."
by Alan M. Dershowitz