In Sweden and the West, What Message Are We Muslims Sending?
"I just want to make a living but those Islamist crazies won't leave us alone. They say they support jihad, they deal drugs, they get drunk and harass women. I swear to Allah, sometimes I feel I am not living in Malmö but in Afghanistan." — Mr. S., Palestinian refugee from Jordan living in Sweden.
"I am religious, but I cannot accept what the Muslim fundamentalists have been doing to this country. I have had job offers to teach at major Swedish cities, but instead chose to go to a remote town where I would not have to see those fundamentalist immigrants." — Muslim College Professor, northern Sweden.
If secular Western countries are evil and immoral in the view of some Muslims, why don't those who feel that way leave and relocate in Islamist states such as Iran and Afghanistan? Where is our Islamic rage against these lunatics? Our silence means that we agree to what the fundamentalists do and say. Can we than blame some Westerns for fearing us when we respond with hostility to their welcoming and generosity?
Renowned for tolerance and multiculturalism, Sweden has been most welcoming to immigrants from Muslims countries. As a result, today 350,000 of Sweden's population of 9.5 million are Muslims. On a recent visit to Sweden, this Muslim author saw that the Swedes' welcoming and tolerance have been abused by many Muslims. They respond to Sweden's kindness by seeking to Islamize the place.
According to a 2007 report by the Open Society Institute, the Muslim population of Sweden is estimated at between 250,000 and 400,000, representing between 1.8% and 4.4% of the Sweden's population.
In Uppsala, the fourth-largest city in Sweden and the seat of Archbishop of the Church of Sweden, a Swedish activist complained that the Muslim-dominated areas in Uppsala were "full of fundamentalists who are out of control... even the Swedish police fear going there because many Arab and Muslim youth will attack them with rocks. Even providers of Swedish state services are afraid to operate in the Muslim and Arab areas in Uppsala."
A local police officer who spoke on the condition of anonymity -- noting that he was not speaking in the name of the authorities -- confirmed what the activist said. "Police cars that approach Arab and Muslim areas are regularly attacked with rocks," he said. "At the moment, local Swedish authorities are not sure how to keep providing public services in those areas. They are even considering rolling back certain state services there. It is just too risky to operate in such a hostile environment. A few residents of the Arab-Muslim areas in Uppsala describe their neighborhoods as 'Sharia areas where Sweden's government is not welcome.'"
Immigrant youths from a mainly Muslim area of Stockholm hurl rocks at police during a week of rioting in May 2013. (Image source: RT YouTube video)
Another police officer said, "We think of them [the Muslims] as Swedes, all are equal under the law, this is how we do things in Sweden. We would never judge the majority by the actions of few, there are many great Muslims we deal with... but we still cannot understand why many Muslims in this town hate us so much? We have never done anything bad to them!"
A local businessman in Uppsala, said, "I just feel sad for the insults we get from many Arabs and Muslims in this town. We consider them Swedes; they consider us enemies. We are doing our job, we are protecting them, and we will never fail them or look down on them, why are we received with such hostility?"
In Stockholm, while wearing my usual Palestinian keffiyeh headscarf, I went to the Jewish neighborhood and took a lengthy stroll there. No one gave me a bad look; one young man asked to take a photo with me.
This incident made me wonder: Would a Jew wearing a skullcap be tolerated if he entered an Arab or Muslim-dominated area in Sweden?
A Swedish Jew mentioned how he was attacked by three Arab men outside an Israeli restaurant because he was wearing a skullcap. Wearing my keffiyeh, I went to the same restaurant, and the owner warmly welcomed me.
An elderly couple from Citykyrkan, in Stockholm, mentioned how they had to leave their home and relocate after their area had become dominated by Muslim immigrants. "What hurts me the most," the woman said, "is that they smile to my face and hate me behind my back. We do not hate Muslims, but why is there all that hatred from some Muslims towards us? Our daughter's ex-fiancé is a Muslim; he is intelligent and he has a legitimate job, why can't his Muslim brothers act like him?"
The man said, "I am not sure where we are going in this country. We feel that we have lost our country forever to Islamists."
What message are we Arabs and Muslims in the West sending to the world by our actions of intolerance and arrogance such as the ones described above?
Can we then blame some Westerners for fearing us when we respond to their welcoming and generosity with hostility?
Malmö, Sweden's third largest city, where one quarter of the population is Muslim, is another Muslim stronghold in Sweden where the fire department and emergency workers no longer enter Muslim immigrants' areas without police protection.
When two Swedes, one a community leader, were to visit Malmö to examine the situation on the ground, they both said it was too risky to go.
Mr. S., a Palestinian living in Malmö, arrived in Sweden as a refugee fleeing the Jordanian intelligence service two decades ago. He said, "I am a true Muslim. My wife wears hijab, I appreciate this country, and I just want to make a living but those Islamist crazies won't leave us alone. They say they support jihad, they deal drugs, they get drunk and harass women. At the same time, they look down on me because I have Christian Swedish friends. They threatened my eldest son; they said his friends are white non-Muslim Swedes. I swear to Allah, sometimes I feel I am not living in Malmö but in Afghanistan."
"My daughter does not wear hijab," he added. "She has blonde hair and could easily pass for a Swede, therefore the minute she leaves the house, the local Muslim men start harassing her, thinking she is a native Swede. They think of Swedish girls as easy and prostitutes. When I confront these men harassing my daughter, they bluntly tell me they thought she was a Swede and they would have not harassed her if they had known she was a Muslim. Tell me what should I do now? Cut my daughter's hair? Force her to wear hijab? Now I understand how Swedes feel about us Muslims harassing their sisters and daughters."
Another Palestinian, a college professor, who lives in a small town in northern Sweden, said, "I am religious, but I cannot accept what the Muslim fundamentalists have been doing to this country. I have had job offers to teach at major Swedish cities, but instead chose to go to a remote town where I would not have to see fundamentalist immigrants. Our people are playing with fire. The Swedes are very polite and tolerant by nature, but I doubt they can take the Islamic provocation of this country much longer. I am not sure what will happen, but I would not be surprised if one day Sweden bans immigration from all Arab and Muslim countries."
As a practicing Muslim living in Europe, I could not help asking myself: Why do we Muslims -- or at least a good number of us -- choose to provoke the countries that open their doors to us?
How come we manage to intermediate Western societies we live in, whether Sweden, Norway, Denmark, the UK, France, Canada or the United States?
Those of us who do not wish to live in the secular West -- why did we go there in the first place?
If secular Western countries are evil and immoral in the view of some Muslims, why don't those who feel that way leave and relocate in Islamist states such Iran or Afghanistan?
I would love to think that the Islamist fundamentalists in the West do not represent the majority of Muslims. But if that is so, where is our Islamic rage against these lunatics?
Why are we Muslims in the West silent about those fundamentalists who want to Islamize and terrorize the countries we live in?
Our silence means either that we do not care for our adoptive countries, or worse, that we agree to what the fundamentalists say and do.
Many of us Muslims like what the Islamists say and do, and that is why we are silent. There are countless Muslims who want to Islamize the West by changing it from within, using demographic, legal, and cultural changes, slowly but surely, to do so.
Or is it that many of us Muslims in the West are enjoying governments' free hand-outs -- housing, education, healthcare, often even cash -- so we choose to stay while hating and insulting the societies that that pay for our stays with their tax money?
But it would be helpful if the other Muslims in Sweden and the West would make a clear choice to accept the West and respect its values, or else leave and go to a country that already embraces Islamist values.
If not, they should not complain about being labeled as supporting Islamists who want to turn Western states into places for terrorism and Islamism.
If we Muslims are really against these Islamists, we have to take a clear and a vocal stand against them and what they stand for.
Reader comments on this item
|Not fear [65 words]||RM||Aug 15, 2014 09:08|
|Thank you, Mr Zarhan [172 words]||Grasshopper||Jun 26, 2014 23:54|
|Official Swedish propaganda [111 words]||Sk0gr||Jun 20, 2014 18:45|
|Diversion [36 words]||BDD||Jun 14, 2014 16:54|
|Speak Up! [56 words]||SuperDave2||Jun 13, 2014 17:34|
|Message Muslims are sending [57 words]||Babs||Jun 12, 2014 08:45|
|About time [191 words]||D.J.||Jun 12, 2014 01:30|
|In Sweden and the West [158 words]||Denis||Jun 11, 2014 17:03|
|I'm sorry for the ignorance of Europeans [119 words]||Charles Emelogu||Jun 11, 2014 07:01|
|Start by Westernizing your dress. [85 words]||Newspaniard||Jun 11, 2014 04:00|
|↔ Identity [75 words]||dev||Aug 15, 2014 14:23|
|Are Sharia Law adherents Fundamentalists? [44 words]||Lawrence||Jun 11, 2014 01:27|
|The farmer and the viper [55 words]||Ming||Jun 11, 2014 01:15|
|Pull the other leg, Mr. Zahran [183 words]||Gray Herbert||Jun 10, 2014 23:53|
|A question of intolerance [205 words]||Rebecca Ellen Moulds||Jun 10, 2014 23:38|
|Wanting to Islamize the West [161 words]||Graham Ford||Jun 10, 2014 18:25|
|Some questions Mr. Zahran needs to ask himself [402 words]||Steven Buckley||Jun 10, 2014 16:45|
|Agreed [238 words]||Tom Loughlin, Jr.||Jun 10, 2014 16:06|
|Probably the major contributing factor [99 words]||Bro. Nick||Jun 10, 2014 14:54|
|So true [22 words]||Fatima||Jun 10, 2014 14:53|
|The Qur'an, the Hadith and the myth of moderate Islam [450 words]||Clive Reis||Jun 10, 2014 13:50|
|Happy [191 words]||Alexander||Jun 10, 2014 12:19|
|The fatal flaw [149 words]||Doug Mayfield||Jun 10, 2014 11:36|
|The snake story [110 words]||Trumpledor||Jun 10, 2014 10:59|
|Thank you [49 words]||Aez||Jun 10, 2014 10:07|
|Finally! [275 words]||Kaz||Jun 10, 2014 09:42|
|Fear the future [120 words]||A.T. Halmay||Jun 10, 2014 09:11|
|Very thoughtful essay [131 words]||El Cid||Jun 10, 2014 08:01|
|Integrated Islam [177 words]||Judy Weleminsky||Jun 10, 2014 07:43|
|A voice crying in the wilderness [325 words]||E Paul Campbell||Jun 10, 2014 07:28|
|Why Muslims stay in host countries [57 words]||Mimi33706||Jun 10, 2014 07:22|
|Truthful Muslims? [369 words]||Randy Hill||Jun 10, 2014 06:26|
|Moderate Muslims - do a "LIKE" to this. [51 words]||YHH||Jun 10, 2014 06:14|
|Why [60 words]||Stuart Wragg||Jun 10, 2014 06:06|
|Muslims in Sweden [92 words]||Nadia Rance||Jun 10, 2014 05:33|
Comment on this item
by Burak Bekdil
Where Turkey stands today is a perfect example of how, when Islamists -- mild or otherwise -- rule a county, even the most basic liberties are systematically suppressed.
"A climate of fear has emerged in Turkey." — Hasam Kilic, President, Turkey's Constitutional Court.
The prosecutor demanded a heavier penalty for the victim than for her torturers.
The European Commission identified government interference in the judiciary and bans imposed on social media as the major sources of concern regarding Turkey's candidacy for full membership.
by Khaled Abu Toameh
To understand what drives a young Palestinian to carry out such a deadly attack, one needs to look at the statements of Palestinian Authority leaders during the past few weeks.
The anti-Israel campaign of incitement reached its peak with Abbas's speech at the UN a few weeks ago, when he accused Israel of waging a "war of genocide" in the Gaza Strip. Abbas made no reference to Hamas's crimes against both Israelis and Palestinians.
Whatever his motives, it is clear that the man who carried out the most recent attack, was influenced by the messages that Abbas and the Palestinian Authority leadership have been sending their people.
by Richard Kemp
Would General Allen -- or any other general today -- recommend contracting out his country's defenses if it were his country at stake? Of course not.
The Iranian regime remains dedicated to undermining and ultimately destroying the State of Israel. The Islamic State also has Israel in its sights and would certainly use the West Bank as a point from which to attack, if it were open to them.
There can be no two-state solution and no sovereign Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan, however desirable those things might be. The stark military reality is that Israel cannot withdraw its forces from the West Bank.
Fatah leaders ally themselves with the terrorists of Hamas, and, like Hamas, they continue to reject the every existence of the State of Israel.
If Western leaders actually want to help, they should use all diplomatic and economic means to make it clear to the Palestinians that they will never achieve an independent and sovereign state while they remain set on the destruction of the State of Israel.
by Louis René Beres
The Palestine Liberation Organization [PLO], forerunner of today's Palestinian Authority, was founded in 1964, three years before Israel came into the unintended control of the West Bank and Gaza. What therefore was the PLO planning to "liberate"?
Why does no one expect the Palestinians to cease all deliberate and random violence against Israeli civilians before being considered for admission to statehood?
On June 30, 1922, a joint resolution of both Houses of Congress of the United States endorsed a "Mandate for Palestine," confirming the right of Jews to settle anywhere they chose between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. This is the core American legacy of support for a Jewish State that President Obama now somehow fails to recall.
A sovereign state of Palestine, as identified by the Arabs -- a Muslim land occupied by "Palestinian" Arabs -- has never existed; not before 1948, and not before 1967. From the start, it was, and continues to be, the Arab states -- not Israel -- that became the core impediment to Palestinian sovereignty.
by Timon Dias
It looks as if this new law is meant to serve as a severe roadblock to parties that would like to dismantle the EU in a democratic and peaceful way from within.
A rather dull semantic trick pro-EU figures usually apply, is calling their opponents "anti-Europe."