The Anti-Racism Directorate

Reader comment on: Canada's New Blasphemy Laws

Submitted by Moray Watson, Mar 8, 2017 13:53

On the heels of the passing of Ontario Motion M37 (Feb 23, 2017) which reaffirmed the governments support for the mandate of the Anti-Racism Directorate, said Directorate released its 3 year plan on March 7th.

The 3yr plan does indeed have an extensive section of definitions including one for 'islamophobia': Includes racism, stereotypes, prejudice, fear or acts of hostility directed towards individual Muslims or followers of Islam in general. In addition to individual acts of intolerance and racial profiling, Islamophobia can lead to viewing and treating Muslims as a greater security threat on an institutional, systemic and societal level.

This definition has been adopted verbatim from section 3.3 (pg 16) of the Sep 2015 Ontario Human Rights Commission's 'Policy on preventing discrimination based on creed'.

That policy is the starting point for the Ontario governments methodical and purposeful attempts to recharacterize islam into a "race" rather than a "creed". As best I can tell, the purpose for the recharacterization is that islam's ideology is open to attack on the basis that islam is a political construct (totalitarianism), and that it is unclear whether political movements can be considered "creeds".

The Anti-Racism Directorate (brought into existence by Kathleen Wynne via its Feb 2016 mandate)is a disgusting vehicle, which in tandem with the OHRC and its Tribunals, is working towards the fracturing of our society into groups of victims on which the government can bestow its mercies.

The 3 year plan of the Anti-Racism Directorate is a nefarious piece of work, which notes the following: 'The Ministry of Education is funding resources, including training for teachers on Islamophobia to help teachers discuss geopolitical events, negative media narratives, and general stereotypes with their students. This project will be led by the National Council of Canadian Muslims, and include 20 half-day workshops for teachers, including presentations, webinars and print materials.'

In other words, the National Council of Canadian Muslims (nee CAIR-Can), a muslim political advocacy organization is going to be informing our teachers on what should be said about islam in our classrooms, and paid by the Department of Education to do so!! WHO will be available to provide oversight on this revolting relationship, when anyone who dares to rebuke the ideology and actions of islam is labelled an 'islamophobe'.

For good measure, and to complete the circle, On Feb 16, 2017 the Ministry of Education issued a memorandum to Directors of Education titled, 'Resources for Teachers - Anti Racism and Islamophobia', which brings the relationship between the Ministry, the Anti-Racism Directorate and the OHRC. However NO mention of the role of the National Council of Canadian Muslims is made in that memorandum.

Note: Reader comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. Gatestone Institute reserves the right to reject anything found to be objectionable. Reader comments, including the one above, represent solely the opinion or viewpoint of the readers that submitted them and do not represent the opinion or viewpoint of Gatestone Institute. Gatestone Institute takes no responsibility for the content of reader comments.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
No reciprocity [159 words]KennedyMar 10, 2017 14:19
The camel's nose is under the tent. [369 words]Abby PageMar 10, 2017 14:14
The more things change... [64 words]Ray Van DuneMar 9, 2017 23:27
In what kind of world are we living? [115 words]Ondrej KovacicMar 9, 2017 17:25
Excellent. [11 words]DanielMar 9, 2017 11:36
Freer in prison [40 words]Dag WalkerMar 9, 2017 03:43
M103 [8 words]Ted RobinsonMar 9, 2017 03:04
Canada's Blasphemy Laws [44 words]PeterMar 9, 2017 01:40
Total hypocracy [123 words]BillMar 9, 2017 01:27
Canada's New Blasphemy Laws [139 words]Barbara GriffithMar 8, 2017 23:36
Islamawhat [99 words]DaveMar 9, 2017 11:06
Equal application of the Law [46 words]James MeletiouMar 8, 2017 23:00
Omissions [116 words]Morley S. Wolfe Wolfe Q.C.Mar 8, 2017 21:28
Canada blasphemy laws [22 words]RickMar 8, 2017 19:04
A very good article [108 words]CharlieMar 8, 2017 17:24
Canada's M 103 [150 words]J Robert WalshMar 8, 2017 16:52
⇒ The Anti-Racism Directorate [439 words]Moray WatsonMar 8, 2017 13:53
M-103 is a MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD Subversion Operation [267 words]LawrenceMar 8, 2017 13:43
Excellent Article [24 words]Mark AndersonMar 8, 2017 13:31
response to Canada's New Blasphemy Laws [262 words]Pat WalkerMar 8, 2017 13:08
Hate speech vs Hate Laws [59 words]Andrew T. HalmayMar 8, 2017 12:36
Human blender worldwide [61 words]Marilyn BolingMar 8, 2017 12:27
The Obvious [193 words]Rick AmyotMar 8, 2017 10:46
Canada new blasphemy Laws ???? [157 words]Rene DonkMar 8, 2017 10:26
Gee, what a shock... [22 words]afMar 8, 2017 10:17
Scary Stuff [192 words]PaulMar 8, 2017 09:47
This is the last continent - we cannot escape ignorant mistakes once we have messed up. [193 words]DeanMar 8, 2017 09:46
So-called blasphemy [102 words]Michael WaughMar 8, 2017 09:31
Why are the left wingers so afraid of allowing all Canadians to freely voice their opinions? [189 words]Thomas PrattMar 8, 2017 09:30
Words of Wisdom for Canada [194 words]Juanita SkeltonMar 8, 2017 09:18
Fool's paradise [149 words]uncleMar 8, 2017 07:36
Sharia Is Here!!!! [211 words]Jeff PageMar 8, 2017 05:58
canadians aren't much different from europeans and americans [143 words]b.a. freemanMar 13, 2017 12:05
Canada to follow Europe? [47 words]TobyMar 8, 2017 05:46

Comment on this item

Email Address
Title of Comments

Note: Gatestone Institute greatly appreciates your comments. The editors reserve the right, however, not to publish comments containing: incitement to violence, profanity, or any broad-brush slurring of any race, ethnic group or religion. Gatestone also reserves the right to edit comments for length, clarity and grammar. All thoughtful suggestions and analyses will be gratefully considered. Commenters' email addresses will not be displayed publicly. Gatestone regrets that, because of the increasingly great volume of traffic, we are not able to publish them all.