The UN's recent flap

Reader comment on: Are the Hard Leftists Aligned with Radical Islamists?

Submitted by jeb, Mar 17, 2017 09:08

The recent flap over the UN's accusation Israel is an apartheid state sheds light on radicals in the USA one a man named Falk who is on the UNHRC and should be replaced. He is a Obama allied activist.

I posted this on a site that addressed the issue.

Wikileaks describes Falk as a self described American Jewish person. He serves on the UNHRC and was a distinguished Professor at Princeton before that. Several people in comments describe him as a Muslim? Why?
I believe he is probably just another Chomsky addict who reduces civilization to regressive liberal socialist terms like Bernie Sanders and has sold himself to that movement. Falk may ignore the religious Inquisition radical Muslims are now fomenting throughout the ME making it dangerous to simply negotiate is indicative of the PA needing a respite from its incompetence in serving its own people, Abbas can not safely visit a refugee camp. And the 200 plus million dollars Obama gave his Islamist buddies and distributed in spite of President Trump's objections will probably be spent by the PA's elites on various personal accounts or as a means to facilitate their escape if Hamas ever tips their donkey cart over.
Falk should know better than others the importance of pluralism in a societies development and yet he discarded basic principles to advocate a dribble of meaningless socialist values that have failed disastrously throughout the world, in the name of "Peace" and like Chomsky seems committed to a deterministic historical view rather than the facts. In their minds if Israel is prospering everyone else should be, without doing anything of importance for their own betterment except make better suicide vests and missiles that will pierce the Dome. A sign of Islamist aggression or caused by "Poverty"?
It is important to clarify because regressive liberal socialists who are pro-Islam like Obama is, need to be understood in their own right and how they have become submissive to Islam.
Did Falk oppose the UNHRCs attempt five years ago or so to impose sharia law globally and statutes deemed protections against Islamophobia in a UN Resolution? A measure that is only Islamic Supremacist.
The fact is our higher education institutions have advocated activist agendas and must share some of the blame for attempting to reset humanity in a state of regression based on slave values, like the "Professor" who defended slavery under Islam at Georgetown. How can people so smart, be so incredibly stupid?


Note: Reader comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. Gatestone Institute reserves the right to reject anything found to be objectionable. Reader comments, including the one above, represent solely the opinion or viewpoint of the readers that submitted them and do not represent the opinion or viewpoint of Gatestone Institute. Gatestone Institute takes no responsibility for the content of reader comments.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
Islam peaceful? [72 words]MateuszMar 20, 2017 11:17
A Breath of Fresh Air [66 words]Elaine Mayers SalkalnMar 19, 2017 08:20
Silence! Before you offend me! [122 words]Edward ClineMar 18, 2017 09:26
Strong delusion [61 words]JenniferMar 17, 2017 23:45
Jennifers message [27 words]LynetteMar 18, 2017 04:30
Why the DNC and their Leadership Need Sarsour [77 words]JohnMar 17, 2017 20:51
Excellent article [18 words]Brian McMorrisMar 17, 2017 20:34
response to Are the Hard Leftists aligned with Radical Islamists? [58 words]Pat WalkerMar 17, 2017 18:52
Nonsense. [82 words]FredMar 17, 2017 14:38
It's just a viewpoint [66 words]Tommy AtkinsMar 17, 2017 17:56
Useful Idiots [39 words]TomMar 17, 2017 13:19
The continuing human falacies [94 words]Andrew F. CastanedaMar 17, 2017 13:15
What's New? [279 words]David EmeryMar 17, 2017 12:58
They call this: [15 words]stevenlMar 17, 2017 12:52
more moderate muslims [83 words]BadgerMar 17, 2017 12:41
Radical Islam spreads world wide [91 words]Marilyn BolingMar 17, 2017 12:25
Say WHAT?! [81 words]Steven BaileyMar 17, 2017 11:59
Moderate Muslims [110 words]BertiMar 17, 2017 18:08
'moderate' muslims? [20 words]BadgerMar 17, 2017 11:42
Good Article - Worth Hearing The Views of a Saudi Academic On This [5 words]Mark AndersonMar 17, 2017 11:21
Are the Hard Leftists Aligned with Radical Islamists? [38 words]Craig BathurstMar 17, 2017 11:20
Has Mr. Alsaied got access to a different Koran? [338 words]Tommy AtkinsMar 17, 2017 11:17
The Grand Jihad - Radical Islam and Leftism! [121 words]Mike BriggsMar 17, 2017 11:00
Radical Islam beyond redemption. [275 words]Elizabeth LawsonMar 17, 2017 10:32
⇒ The UN's recent flap [411 words]jebMar 17, 2017 09:08
Mythical Islam [150 words]GlenMar 17, 2017 08:59
Muslim bigotry + leftist hypocrisy [90 words]Andy GillMar 17, 2017 08:27
Are the Hard Leftists Aligned with Radical Islamists? [35 words]kingMar 17, 2017 08:12
An extraordinary example of greed-induced short-sightedness of the privileged liberals [122 words]ABDELKADER HAMDAOUIMar 17, 2017 07:41
Peaceful Muslims [50 words]Derek HunnikinMar 17, 2017 07:37
Is that really her name? [22 words]Josephine BaconMar 17, 2017 07:32
A Dishonest Article [145 words]WatchmanMar 17, 2017 07:28
Still The Liberals Believe The Lies [475 words]Jeff PageMar 17, 2017 07:28
Islam = Submit! [60 words]Albert ReingewirtzMar 17, 2017 06:51
RE: This is very real and no longer a conspiracy theory [136 words]Phillip RossleeMar 17, 2017 06:49
Liberalism Gone Mad [181 words]Patricia CanonMar 17, 2017 06:37
A New Category? [26 words]Anson E. LongMar 17, 2017 06:04
Intolerance [14 words]Paul FishmanMar 17, 2017 05:58

Comment on this item

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Gatestone Institute greatly appreciates your comments. The editors reserve the right, however, not to publish comments containing: incitement to violence, profanity, or any broad-brush slurring of any race, ethnic group or religion. Gatestone also reserves the right to edit comments for length, clarity and grammar. All thoughtful suggestions and analyses will be gratefully considered. Commenters' email addresses will not be displayed publicly. Gatestone regrets that, because of the increasingly great volume of traffic, we are not able to publish them all.