Is Obama a "Zionist Agent"?
The Palestinians are furious with U.S. President Barack Obama.
Abbas, for his part, has rejected Obama's opposition to his plan to ask the U.N. to recognize a Palestinian state in September, and says that he will proceed with his efforts.
Both Fatah and Hamas have responded to the speeches of Obama and Netanyahu by declaring that they will go ahead with plans to establish a unity government.
Hamas and Fatah are now hoping to rally as many Arab countries as possible in favor of both their reconciliation agreement and their plan to seek U.N. recognition of a Palestinian state.
The two parties are hoping that the current crisis in relations between the US and the Palestinians will turn into a confrontation between the Arab world and the Obama Administration.
They believe he has "finally shown his true colors," and are convinced that he's "biased" in favor of Israel.
Both Fatah and Hamas have condemned Obama for "succumbing" to pressure from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the pro-Israel "Jewish lobby" in the U.S.
But while Hamas officials have been honest about their views toward Obama, the Fatah leaders in the West Bank have been extremely cautious about expressing their opinion in public.
In private, Fatah leaders have strongly denounced not only Obama, but also Congress for its warm welcome of Netanyahu.
Obama, who until recently was seen as a "friend" of the Palestinians, is now being dubbed, in private, by Fatah representatives, a "Zionist agent" and "pawn" in the hands of Israel and the "Jewish lobby."
While Fatah leaders have remained mum, however, they have unleashed a scathing attack on the U.S. and Obama in their media outlets. There, the tone is much more clear and straightforward, and the bottom line is that Obama is not an honest broker in the Middle East conflict.
It is as if both Fatah and Hamas were expecting Obama to fully endorse their positions. They were expecting the U.S. president to support the Palestinian Authority's intention to ask the United Nations in September to recognize a Palestinian state on the 1967 lines.
They were also expecting Obama to call for a full cessation of settlement construction, and an Israeli withdrawal to the pre-1967 lines, including east Jerusalem.
For Fatah and Hamas, Obama's speech before AIPAC and the standing ovations in Congress for Netanyahu are proof that the Americans are "not on our side." In their eyes, what happened at AIPAC and Congress shows that no U.S. president dares to alienate American Jews.
The reason Fatah has refrained from attacking Obama in public is because it needs Washington's financial and political backing.
What Hamas is saying in public about Obama is what Fatah thinks in private, but is afraid to say.
Comment on this item
by Denis MacEoin
Will radical Muslims line up to be deprogrammed and end up teaching kindergarten or devising a twelve-step program for their younger siblings? Since the start of deradicalization programs, the number of radicalized Muslims has risen.
Why is there no Muslim Peace Movement campaigning for an end to violence in Muslim countries? Why do Muslims -- and others -- take to the streets to condemn democratic Israel, yet never march to protest Hamas's use of Palestinians as human shields, or the violence of al-Qaeda, Boko Haram or any other jihadi group? Why not be angry at the way violent Muslims drag the image of non-violent Muslims in the mud? Many Muslims, however, complain about "Islamophobia" while ignoring the primary causes of hostility to themselves.
Muslims... are trapped, because the Qur'an and the Hadith, which make up the holy writ, all condone or command jihad and hatred for non-believers, and they do so abundantly. But commentators and politicians still wonder where the fighters of the Islamic State... or the killers of Theo van Gogh get their inspiration. A young man who sees the world through such a lens will easily turn to this to justify his desire to wage jihad.
It is still risky for anyone one in any Muslim country to call for a new approach to the most sacred texts.
by Veli Sirin
A historical process is now threatened with failure: the reconciliation of the Turkish State with the Kurds living in Turkey.
Turkish guns point in every direction but that of Kobani, and the Turkish air force continues bombing the Kurdish PKK, not ISIS. Many Kurds believe that the Turkish state considers it acceptable for the "Islamic State" to murder Kurds, and would rather bomb the Kurds than help them against ISIS.
by Burak Bekdil
Where Turkey stands today is a perfect example of how, when Islamists -- mild or otherwise -- rule a county, even the most basic liberties are systematically suppressed.
"A climate of fear has emerged in Turkey." — Hasam Kilic, President, Turkey's Constitutional Court.
The prosecutor demanded a heavier penalty for the victim than for her torturers.
The European Commission identified government interference in the judiciary and bans imposed on social media as the major sources of concern regarding Turkey's candidacy for full membership.
by Khaled Abu Toameh
To understand what drives a young Palestinian to carry out such a deadly attack, one needs to look at the statements of Palestinian Authority leaders during the past few weeks.
The anti-Israel campaign of incitement reached its peak with Abbas's speech at the UN a few weeks ago, when he accused Israel of waging a "war of genocide" in the Gaza Strip. Abbas made no reference to Hamas's crimes against both Israelis and Palestinians.
Whatever his motives, it is clear that the man who carried out the most recent attack, was influenced by the messages that Abbas and the Palestinian Authority leadership have been sending their people.
by Richard Kemp
Would General Allen -- or any other general today -- recommend contracting out his country's defenses if it were his country at stake? Of course not.
The Iranian regime remains dedicated to undermining and ultimately destroying the State of Israel. The Islamic State also has Israel in its sights and would certainly use the West Bank as a point from which to attack, if it were open to them.
There can be no two-state solution and no sovereign Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan, however desirable those things might be. The stark military reality is that Israel cannot withdraw its forces from the West Bank.
Fatah leaders ally themselves with the terrorists of Hamas, and, like Hamas, they continue to reject the every existence of the State of Israel.
If Western leaders actually want to help, they should use all diplomatic and economic means to make it clear to the Palestinians that they will never achieve an independent and sovereign state while they remain set on the destruction of the State of Israel.