Egypt's Government and Media Conspire against Christian Copts
The Egyptian media demonized the protesting Christians during the original Maspero Massacre, in which Egyptians in armored vehicles mowed down protesting Christians. They were followed by the Western media, who seem never to check anything, who again turned the victims into the persecutors in their version of the event.
From top to bottom, from the Muslim Brotherhood president to the Muslim Brotherhood-monitored media, the lies concerning Egypt's Christian minority—whether lies from the President, claiming the Copts are cared for, or whether lies from the media, demonizing them—continue nonstop.
After two Christian boys were arrested earlier this month, for example, for allegedly blaspheming a Quran and were subsequently released, the Egyptian media, following the claims of the Muslim Brotherhood, credited President Morsi with their release. Ikhwan Web, the Muslim Brotherhood's official English website, and the website of its political wing, the Freedom and Justice Party, both ran a report entitled, "Morsi Orders Release of Christian Boys Held for Desecrating Holy Quran in Egypt," the opening sentence of which reads: "Two Egyptian Coptic boys are freed from juvenile detention, at President Morsi's instructions…" This magnanimous narrative was widely disseminated in the media, including in the West.
According to the lawyer of the two Christian boys, Guirgus Bebaway, however, "the claim that Morsi interfered to have the two children released is simply false …. President Morsi had nothing to do with the Release of Nabil Nady Rizk, 10 years old, and Mina Nagui Farag, 9 years old," the two boys who "were taken to a different place until the situation calms down in their village," where wild riots and protests had ensued.
Similarly, Morsi's visit to the Sinai Peninsula—where, among other signs of jihadi infiltration, Christians were recently attacked and displaced—was trumpeted by the Western media as proof of his commitment to protect the Copts. In a report, for instance, entitled, "Egypt's president visits Sinai to 'reassure' Copts," AFP wrote, "Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi visited the Sinai peninsula on Friday to meet with and reassure Coptic families who fled from the town of Rafah after receiving death threats, his Facebook page said." (Emphasis added)
According to the Coptic bishop of Sinai, however, although he and many other representatives of the Coptic community were eager to meet with Morsi, they were never allowed an opportunity. Rather, they were kept in the lobby with Sinai's Bedouins and others, where they all got to hear the president declare from afar some generic platitudes concerning the equality of all Egyptians, after which Bishop Qazmaan remarked, "We cannot determine the sincerity of his words."
Finally, because Egypt's Copts were recently denied justice after last year's Maspero Massacre — when the Egyptian military slaughtered Christians who were protesting the constant attacks on their churches, including running over them with armored vehicles, only to be exonerated in court — the Copts congregated again around Maspero both to protest and mark the anniversary of the incident. Just as the Egyptian media had demonized the protesting Christians during the original Maspero Massacre — falsely claiming that Copts were attacking and killing Egypt's soldiers, while Egyptian soldiers in armored vehicles were mowing down protesting Christians — they were followed by the Western media, who seem never to check anything, who again turned the victims into the persecutors in their version of the event.
A TV anchorman for El Qahira station, for example, while covering the anniversary march, asked, "Why rehash all this?" and, in the non-sequitur of the year, claimed that whenever Copts demonstrate and call for their rights, "only one nation, one people" profits: Israel. He thereby again portrayed Egypt's Christian minority, who seek only equality, as "traitors," more interested in empowering foreign powers than in helping to build Egypt. He even broadcast non-violent scenes from last year's massacre — not the ones of soldiers shooting at and running over Christians — and asked, "What's the big deal"?
The sister of one of the slain Copts from the massacre, Mina Daniel, confirmed all this, saying that the media "continues to be corrupt"; that, although she was invited to be interviewed by one station, the people there proceeded to edit and delete her words; and that, in short, "Nothing has changed … the same thing that happened last year during the massacre, when the media claimed Copts were attacking the military, is happening today… this is a catastrophe, and we continue to suffer from the same story."
The Copts continue to be portrayed as disloyal troublemakers, who are nonetheless cared for by the government—when the truth is the exact opposite.
receive the latest by email: subscribe to the free gatestone institute mailing list
Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center and an Associate Fellow at the Middle East Forum.
Reader comments on this item
|Dumbing Down of Western Media Outlets [107 words]||L. Wilkes||Nov 14, 2012 23:10|
|Syrian Christians [15 words]||Mir||Nov 3, 2012 15:35|
|The Plight of Christians in Egypt & Al Jazeera conspiracies [117 words]||Lawrence Emehel||Nov 2, 2012 16:36|
Comment on this item
by Soeren Kern
Hamas would likely resort to violence to thwart any attempts to disarm the group. It is therefore highly unlikely the Europeans would confront Hamas in any meaningful way.
Spanish intelligence agents met secretly with Hezbollah operatives, who agreed to provide "escorts" to protect Spanish UNIFIL patrols. The quid pro quo was that Spanish troops would look the other way while Hezbollah was allowed to rearm for its next war with Israel. Hezbollah's message to Spain was: mind your own business.
If the European experience with Hezbollah in Lebanon is any indication, not only will Hamas not be disarmed, it will be rearmed as European monitors look on and do nothing.
What is clear is that European leaders have never been committed to honoring either the letter or the spirit of UN Resolutions 1559, 1680 and 1701, all of which were aimed at preventing Hezbollah from rearming.
by Debalina Ghoshal
According to former Bush administration official Stephen Rademaker, for the United States to respond to Russian violations of the treaty by pulling out of it would be "welcome in Moscow," which is "wrestling with the question of how they terminate [the treaty]" and thus, the United States should not make it easier for the Russians to leave.
by Guy Millière
Belgian security services have estimated that the number of European jihadists in Syria may be over 4000.
European leaders have directed their nastiest comments against the Jewish state, none of them has asked why Palestinian organizations in Gaza put their stockpiles of weapons in hospitals, homes, schools and mosques, or their command and control centers at the bottom of large apartment buildings or underneath hospitals. None of them has even said that Hamas is a terrorist organization despite its genocidal charter.
The majority of them are wedded to the idea of redistribution. Their policies are anti-growth, do not afford people any economic opportunity, and are what caused these economic crises in Europe in the first place. The United States seems to be following these thoroughly failed policies as well.
"Europe could not stay the same with a different population in it." — Christopher Caldwell, Reflections on the Revolution in Europe.
by Raymond Ibrahim
"I abducted your girls. I will sell them on the market, by Allah... There is a market for selling humans. Allah says I should sell." — Abubakar Shekau, leader of Boko Haram.
Hillary Clinton repeatedly refused to designate Boko Haram a terrorist organization.
In Malaysia -- regularly portrayed in the West as a moderate Muslim nation -- any attempt to promote religions other than Islam is illegal.
"The reason they want to kill me is very clear -- it is because of being a convert to Christianity." — Hassan Muwanguzi, Uganda.
by Dexter Van Zile
Rev. Hanna Massad does not mention that perhaps Hamas actually wants the blockade to end so it can bring in more weapons and cement to build attack-tunnels so it can "finish the job."
Hamas does not just admit to using human shields, it brags about using human shields. Why does Massad have to inject an air of uncertainty about Hamas's use of human shields when no such uncertainty exists?
The problem is that any self-respecting journalist would confront Massad with a follow-up question about Hamas's ideology and violence, but not the folks at Christianity Today.