First They Came for Mila Kunis
There is a growing trend wherein an anti-Semitic collection of hate-mongers are abusing the democratic Parliament of Ukraine to spew messages and incite violence in ways that we had hoped were relegated to the distant past.
One of the most recognizable figures of Ukrainian Jewish descent, the beautiful and talented actress Mila Kunis, recently was targeted by a member of the Ukrainian Parliament from the far-right Svoboda Party – known for regularly injecting anti-Semitism into its speeches and public pronouncements. He sneeringly proclaimed that she was "not Ukrainian but a zhydovka." Zhydovka is a hurtful slur for a Jew, and this was apparently a gutter effort to inject Jew-hatred into the acceptable bounds of mainstream Ukrainian discourse.
Despite the widely accepted notion that we live in an ever-more globalized world, too many people are skeptical that what happens in the halls of some far-off parliament on the other side of the world bears any impact on our way of life. On the contrary, events now developing here in Ukraine should oblige every person who dreams of a more tolerant and peaceful international community to sit up and take notice.
There is a growing trend wherein an anti-Semitic collection of hate-mongers are abusing the democratic Parliament of Ukraine to spew messages and incite violence in ways that we had hoped were relegated to the distant past. In our recent elections, it was horrifying to witness Svododa gain over 10% of the national vote. Like all ultra-nationalist parties, they campaigned and were elected on a message intended to inject fear into society. They shrilly warn that foreigners and minorities are positioned to take over the country. Idolizing some of the most virulently anti-freedom icons of generations past, including most prominently the architect of Nazi propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, Svoboda works hard to make hatred commonplace — and acceptable — throughout Ukrainian society.
Regrettably, Svoboda Party leaders realize that they have fertile ground on which to harvest such a dangerous agenda. While it has been on the decline in recent decades, there is no disputing that anti-Semitism, particularly among the less educated sectors of our society, remains ingrained in the minds of all too many. Svoboda has exploited the mistrust of Jews to gain popularity among some in the less-advantaged classes who welcomed the chance to be part of campaigns of hate.
If Svoboda's growing popularity goes unnoticed outside of the Ukraine's borders, we may quickly reach a point of no return. At that time, the idea of the party enjoying broad legislative powers to limit freedoms of expression amongst those who think unlike them would serve to reduce or completely prevent any immigration from nations they view as un-Ukrainian. All this could happen despite the decisive steps of the current government in Kiev to oppose the inroads made by Svoboda. One would have to be utterly ignorant of the history of this region to be unaware that campaigns begun ostensibly in the guise of populism and democracy can quickly decline into mass chaos, violence and, as before, genocide.
Thankfully, we are not near that point and there is no need yet to panic. The international institutions in place in the 21st century are strong enough to notice the rise of this devil at an early stage. Once, not long ago, the international community looked on in silence as Hitler and the Nazis deluded the world into thinking that their Jew-hatred was not worthy or "dangerous enough" to warrant global condemnation.
When the world finally did take notice, it was too late.
Anti-Semitism and xenophobia are the most insidiously contagious social diseases humanity has ever experienced. Civilized societies become infected with these sicknesses before they even pause to assess the damage that the illness is sure to impose.
This issue cries out for the immediate and sincere attention of the international community, most notably the leadership of the American Jewish community and the government of the United States of America. Ukraine and the USA have developed a strong alliance defined by economic partnerships and a diplomatic vision of how much there is that unites us in working together to address threats and cultivate opportunities. Should Svoboda continue to expand, it can only harm regional and international agreements and impose instability on our mutual markets.
Hatred never ends with speech; it soon escalates to more violent expressions. Nor can hatred be contained to any national borders, particularly in today's world of social media and instant communication.
I appeal to all peaceful and caring leaders around the world to join me in opposing everything that Svoboda represents. We all know that the stakes are far too high for the world to be able to say, "We did not know and therefore we did not act."
Oleksandr Feldman is a member of the Parliament of Ukraine and President of the Ukrainian Jewish Committee.
Reader comments on this item
|Ukrainian Svoboda (Freedom) Party [140 words]||Mike||Jul 7, 2013 19:43|
|Someone Needs To Warn Google... [32 words]||JameSmace||Feb 17, 2013 13:12|
|Stay out of it [336 words]||Thomas||Feb 8, 2013 09:48|
|Jews in Ukraine [23 words]||Dannykid||Feb 4, 2013 09:47|
|Foolish idea [27 words]||Lou de Louzada||Feb 4, 2013 08:38|
Comment on this item
by Khaled Abu Toameh
To understand what drives a young Palestinian to carry out such a deadly attack, one needs to look at the statements of Palestinian Authority leaders during the past few weeks.
The anti-Israel campaign of incitement reached its peak with Abbas's speech at the UN a few weeks ago, when he accused Israel of waging a "war of genocide" in the Gaza Strip. Abbas made no reference to Hamas's crimes against both Israelis and Palestinians.
Whatever his motives, it is clear that the man who carried out the most recent attack, was influenced by the messages that Abbas and the Palestinian Authority leadership have been sending their people.
by Richard Kemp
Would General Allen -- or any other general today -- recommend contracting out his country's defenses if it were his country at stake? Of course not.
The Iranian regime remains dedicated to undermining and ultimately destroying the State of Israel. The Islamic State also has Israel in its sights and would certainly use the West Bank as a point from which to attack, if it were open to them.
There can be no two-state solution and no sovereign Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan, however desirable those things might be. The stark military reality is that Israel cannot withdraw its forces from the West Bank.
Fatah leaders ally themselves with the terrorists of Hamas, and, like Hamas, they continue to reject the every existence of the State of Israel.
If Western leaders actually want to help, they should use all diplomatic and economic means to make it clear to the Palestinians that they will never achieve an independent and sovereign state while they remain set on the destruction of the State of Israel.
by Louis René Beres
The Palestine Liberation Organization [PLO], forerunner of today's Palestinian Authority, was founded in 1964, three years before Israel came into the unintended control of the West Bank and Gaza. What therefore was the PLO planning to "liberate"?
Why does no one expect the Palestinians to cease all deliberate and random violence against Israeli civilians before being considered for admission to statehood?
On June 30, 1922, a joint resolution of both Houses of Congress of the United States endorsed a "Mandate for Palestine," confirming the right of Jews to settle anywhere they chose between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. This is the core American legacy of support for a Jewish State that President Obama now somehow fails to recall.
A sovereign state of Palestine, as identified by the Arabs -- a Muslim land occupied by "Palestinian" Arabs -- has never existed; not before 1948, and not before 1967. From the start, it was, and continues to be, the Arab states -- not Israel -- that became the core impediment to Palestinian sovereignty.
by Timon Dias
It looks as if this new law is meant to serve as a severe roadblock to parties that would like to dismantle the EU in a democratic and peaceful way from within.
A rather dull semantic trick pro-EU figures usually apply, is calling their opponents "anti-Europe."
by Alan M. Dershowitz