(Jerusalem) - Human Rights Watch’s (HRW) recent fundraising efforts in Saudi Arabia has become a focus of debate, particularly as HRW officials capitalized on their anti-Israel agenda.

But HRW’s failures go far deeper. This report by Jerusalem-based NGO Monitor highlights the long record of errors and inconsistencies in HRW’s research, including the following examples:   

•        Gaza Beach Incident (June 2006):  In widely publicized statements, HRW first blamed live Israeli artillery fire, explicitly rejecting the possibility of unexploded ordnance.  HRW officials then accepted the second version, but later reversed course, repeating the false charges leveled at Israel.  HRW has not issued corrections.  

•        Second Lebanon War (July-Aug 2006): There are numerous examples of HRW reports based on speculation and false claims. On 29 July, HRW alleged that Israel killed 54 civilians at Qana, but later acknowledged the ICRC version of 28 dead (some of which may have been Hizbollah personnel). HRW officials chose to ignore the ICRC information in order to promote its anti-Israel agenda.  And, in another example, a major HRW report found “no cases” of Hezbollah’s use of human shields, despite video evidence and independent reports clearly showing otherwise.  

•        Reuters Cameraman (April 2008): HRW condemned Israel for deliberately “targeting” a journalist with a camera on his shoulder in a battle zone.  When the IDF detailed report showed the killing was accidental, HRW did not withdraw its false accusation. 

•        Gaza War (Dec 2008 - Jan 2009): HRW denied Hamas’ use of human shields, ignoring clear evidence.  And allegations that the IDF illegally used white phosphorous weapons and drones were based on unverifiable “eyewitness” accounts and speculative weapons analysis

NGO Monitor’s Executive Director, Prof Gerald Steinberg said, “HRW has been obsessively and falsely accusing Israel for years and it’s no surprise that this was the basis for their fundraising efforts in Saudi Arabia.  Time and again, their speculative research has proved to be inaccurate, one sided and based on a politically motivated agenda.  That HRW sees fit to raise funds in one of the Middle East’s most repressive countries, while obsessively condemning legitimate Israeli defense against terror, shows that HRW has truly lost its moral compass.”    



© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Recent Articles by
receive the latest by email: subscribe to the free gatestone institute mailing list.


Comment on this item

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Gatestone Institute greatly appreciates your comments. The editors reserve the right, however, not to publish comments containing: incitement to violence, profanity, or any broad-brush slurring of any race, ethnic group or religion. Gatestone also reserves the right to edit comments for length, clarity and grammar. All thoughtful suggestions and analyses will be gratefully considered. Commenters' email addresses will not be displayed publicly. Gatestone regrets that, because of the increasingly great volume of traffic, we are not able to publish them all.