People Like Us

Reader comment on: The West's Real Bigotry: Rejecting Persecuted Christians

Submitted by John MacArthur, Feb 5, 2017 08:14

When immigration was a simpler, less political affair, the Christian West recognized the moral imperatives of its faith. They welcomed the sojourner and refugee, in the belief that they would ultimately settle, thrive and become People Like Us. As Christian values have declined in the public sphere, the discourse has shifted and Muslims generally have been perceived as more nominal in their faith, just because the indigenous Christian population is as well - it's deeply unfashionable to be radical. Consequently, the rational West thinks it logically inconceivable that people actually would prefer Shari'a to the freedoms democracy provides, so have no problem protesting loudly on the streets waving placards with 'Let Them In' on them when governments decline to open the floodgates. Muslims are seen as less threatening and the belief is that they will quietly assimilate, in short, their religion is no barrier to finding fulfillment in their adopted country. Nothing could be further from the truth. Islam's core insistence on Dar al Islam or Dar al Harb leaves no room for doubt and should in and of itself be sufficient to convince even the most snowflake liberal that the Muslim, however lukewarm, will instinctively reject the notion that assimilation offers many more benefits than isolation and the consequent huddling in their self-imposed comfort zones become breeding grounds for fanaticism and extremism.


Note: Reader comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. Gatestone Institute reserves the right to reject anything found to be objectionable. Reader comments, including the one above, represent solely the opinion or viewpoint of the readers that submitted them and do not represent the opinion or viewpoint of Gatestone Institute. Gatestone Institute takes no responsibility for the content of reader comments.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
The West's Real Bigotry [131 words]Peter TerryMar 16, 2017 08:51
western governments are morally repugnant [199 words]b.a. freemanFeb 6, 2017 20:27
Morally Repugnant [100 words]Menahem LesterFeb 16, 2017 12:44
The interpreters are the real problem in Germany [94 words]Hartmut BrocharskiFeb 6, 2017 09:16
Eerily similar [16 words]Tess TierneyFeb 5, 2017 19:34
For shame and contempt [16 words]Andrew T. HalmayFeb 5, 2017 15:55
Western elites are virtually Muslim, and if they're not then they will be [50 words]MichaelFeb 5, 2017 15:22
Persecution of Christian Minorities [49 words]clive delmonteFeb 5, 2017 12:30
Most of the victims of Isis have actually been Muslims [10 words]S SmithFeb 5, 2017 12:15
So very shameful [129 words]Deirdre TrotmanFeb 5, 2017 11:54
Persecution of Christians and Yazidis [69 words]clive delmonteFeb 5, 2017 11:43
Clive delmonte proposed petition [29 words]John WinlowFeb 5, 2017 12:23
""Unfortunately, the West has rejected the idea of solidarity with the Christians of the Middle East," [82 words]John WinlowFeb 5, 2017 11:05
Re: The West's Real Bigotry: Rejecting Persecuted Christians [48 words]Gomer WumphfFeb 5, 2017 10:38
Belated help from Washington [131 words]Edward ClineFeb 5, 2017 09:51
Thank you [12 words]John GehrkeFeb 5, 2017 09:12
This Is Why They Are Opposed To Trump. [297 words]Jeff PageFeb 5, 2017 08:41
Western leaders [95 words]richardFeb 5, 2017 20:32
⇒ People Like Us [223 words]John MacArthurFeb 5, 2017 08:14
True Bigots [147 words]Phil McGooFeb 5, 2017 07:40

Comment on this item

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Gatestone Institute greatly appreciates your comments. The editors reserve the right, however, not to publish comments containing: incitement to violence, profanity, or any broad-brush slurring of any race, ethnic group or religion. Gatestone also reserves the right to edit comments for length, clarity and grammar. All thoughtful suggestions and analyses will be gratefully considered. Commenters' email addresses will not be displayed publicly. Gatestone regrets that, because of the increasingly great volume of traffic, we are not able to publish them all.