Nice thoughts, but do they matter?
Reader comment on: Jerusalem, Capital of Israel: An Islamic Prophecy
Submitted by Phillip Slepian, Jan 29, 2013 12:51
Assuming Salim's interpretation of the Koran and other Islamic texts is legitimate, his sentiments are quaint, but in the end, meaningless. Voices like Salim's are few and far between in the Islamic Umma, and those in power work quickly and ruthlessly to silence them. Of course there were Germans in World War II who objected to the Nazi rulers, but it made no difference. They were silenced, imprisoned, or executed.
While Salim's points are reasonable on their face, they still eminate from the basis that Islam is the one and only legitimate faith. The idea that if others, like the Jews, "do well" they will benefit from Allah's largesse ring hollow to non-Muslims. What does "do well" really mean? Many Islamic scholars would suggest that for the Jew or the Christian to "do well" means, at the least, to accept their dhimmi status within the Islamic Umma and pay the jizya - to "feel themselves subdued" as the Koran states.
How can Salim reconcile the Jewish right to the land of Israel and Muhammad's prophecy of a world completely submitted to Islam? How can he reconcile all of the seemingly contradictory statements in Islamic texts regarding Islam, Judaism, and Christianity? What about the principle of abrogation? Salim admits that Jerusalem does not appear once in the Koran (it appears several hundred times in the Torah), yet has no trouble naming it Islam's third holiest city. How can he justify that? Salim suggests that a state of Palestine in Judea and Samaria is a legitimate goal (albeit minus Jerusalem), but does not address the historical reality that these territories are the very heart of the ancestral Jewish national homeland. Salim's piece begs more questions than it answers.
Salim should understand that non-Muslims do not wish to be defined by Islam.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. This site reserves the right to reject anything found to be objectionable.
Submit a comment on this article
Other reader comments on this item
| Title | By | Date |
| Koran and the Jews [34 words] | Sandra | Feb 20, 2013 06:53 |
| Forgery of history: the Muslims are champions! [112 words] | François Alexandre | Feb 13, 2013 02:40 |
| Muhammad's 'prophecy' [89 words] | Winnie | Feb 4, 2013 12:59 |
| Read your Quran and Hadith more closely, Mr. Salim. [30 words] | Steven Buckley | Jan 31, 2013 17:25 |
| Who is the author? [20 words] | PC | Jan 30, 2013 12:54 |
| I wonder...? [93 words] | Max Modine | Jan 29, 2013 22:49 |
| ↔ Racist? [20 words] | Treehugger | Feb 15, 2013 11:05 |
| Wow [5 words] | Robert Nicholson | Jan 29, 2013 20:34 |
| ⇒ Nice thoughts, but do they matter? [299 words] | Phillip Slepian | Jan 29, 2013 12:51 |
| ↔ Al taqiyya? [62 words] | Jim Fox | Feb 7, 2013 14:00 |
Comment on this item
Fatah's Drive Against "Normalization"
by Khaled Abu Toameh
The Fatah activists who are threatening Palestinian teenagers for talking to Israelis and playing football with them are the same people who claim, at least in public, that they support the peace process with Israel. But how can there ever be a peace process when anyone who meets with an Israeli is immediately denounced as a traitor? It is worth noting that most of these denunciations are coming form the "moderate" Fatah, and not from Hamas.
The U.S. Role in the Sunni-Shi'ite Conflict
by Harold Rhode
America should back only pro-American forces who do not privately finance or publicly promote hatred against the U.S. It is in America's interest to rid the Muslim world of the Islamic fundamentalist forces whose goals and actions are inimical to American and Western interests; not to cozy up to them.
Growing Threats to Academic Freedom
by Edward S. Beck
Hawking's behavior is based on inaccurate, biased information. If he has insightful thoughts about resolving the Israeli-Palestinian issues, let him come and share them. Stating them at the conference is the way for them to have impact.
The Interfaith Racket: Passport to Credibility
by Douglas Murray
Because Ahmed was the first Muslim peer, most people were eager to do anything they could to cover for him, forgive him, reinstate him time and again – and even now are not able to believe the words that came from his mouth in Pakistan because they differed from the words that came from his mouth at interfaith meetings in London.
Muslims Demand Germany "Make Islam Equal to Christianity"
by Soeren Kern
Muslims attending the German Islam Conference were apparently offended by the insinuation that Islam could be radical or violent.
- Muslims Demand Germany "Make Islam Equal to Christianity"
by Soeren Kern - Scottish Universities Hotbeds of Anti-Jewish Sentiment
by Samuel Westrop - Weapons of Mass Destruction in the Middle East
by Ali Salim - The U.S. Role in the Sunni-Shi'ite Conflict
by Harold Rhode - The Interfaith Racket: Passport to Credibility
by Douglas Murray
- Muslims Demand Germany "Make Islam Equal to Christianity"
by Soeren Kern - The Interfaith Racket: Passport to Credibility
by Douglas Murray - Al-Qaradawi and the New Religious Conflict With Israel
by Khaled Abu Toameh - Scottish Universities Hotbeds of Anti-Jewish Sentiment
by Samuel Westrop - "Belgium Will Become an Islamic State"
by Soeren Kern




Follow Gatestone: