NGO Monitor

  • In “Precisely Wrong: Gaza Civilians Killed by Israeli Drone-Launched Missiles” (June 30, 2009), Human Rights Watch uses the term “war crimes” 7 times, and the alleged attacks are termed “unlawful.” The case is entirely speculative, but the conclusions are stated with absolute assurance, as if the evidence was totally clear.

  • HRW emphasizes pseudo-technical and legal claims that are unfounded or irrelevant, but present the facade of expertise. Credible and verifiable evidence is not provided.

  • Military experts, including Robert Hewson of Jane’s Air-Launched Weapons and retired British colonel Richard Kemp, reject HRW’s “claims and assumptions about weapons and drones.”

  • On the legal issue of military necessity, the report takes at face value Palestinian claims of seeing no active Hamas fighters in the area of the alleged attacks. This speculation has been refuted, and is irrelevant if the targets were related to Hamas command and communications, weapons storage, or efforts to find kidnapped soldier Gilad Shalit.

  • The text appears to reflect the authors’ lack of significant battlefield experience, particularly related to split-second decision making.





    © 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

    Recent Articles by
    receive the latest by email: subscribe to the free gatestone institute mailing list.


    Comment on this item

    Email me if someone replies to my comment

    Note: Gatestone Institute greatly appreciates your comments. The editors reserve the right, however, not to publish comments containing: incitement to violence, profanity, or any broad-brush slurring of any race, ethnic group or religion. Gatestone also reserves the right to edit comments for length, clarity and grammar. All thoughtful suggestions and analyses will be gratefully considered. Commenters' email addresses will not be displayed publicly. Gatestone regrets that, because of the increasingly great volume of traffic, we are not able to publish them all.