SPLC? Who Are You? Yet Another Nonentity!

Reader comment on: The New Anti-Racist Racists

Submitted by Jeff Page, Oct 28, 2016 05:59

Douglas Murray is always on the ball! SPLC morons are solely interested in maintaining their own lifestyles and salaries, and will dive down deep to do so. Even to treachery, lies, deceit, with the added dose of backward thinking.

It's amazing how such organisations are able to morph into what is suddenly the trendy topic and not even take a breath.

Those at the top are hypocrites who will rollover if the strategy of the current topic changes. Very much as a chameleon adapts to suit the surroundings, so the SPLC adapts in order to survive. I doubt whether any of their staff has had extra-marital relations or consumed a glass of Merlot, they are obviously too anally retentive to even contemplate such normal things!

Where does their income come from? Are they using donations, taxpayers money, media commissions, or do they consider them to be a charitable organisation?

Whatever and wherever they are funded from needs to look closely at what their current agenda appears to be. The head honcho and minions should be advised that their actions are treasonous and so should cease immediately, and any sources of income to their fighting fund needs to be stopped. There is enough censorship being imposed from government sources, to prevent any anti Muslim feelings. Maybe Saudi Arabia is behind them and supplying large amounts of cash to achieve their aim of Islamic domination worldwide. Just a thought!

In reality the SPLC is a nonentity that is grasping at straws in order to keep their own positions and agendas in the public arena. What we need is a Gladiator with the verbal skills of Douglas Murray to deliver the death blow to such an organistion as the now totally discredited SPLC! And soon!

Note: Reader comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. Gatestone Institute reserves the right to reject anything found to be objectionable. Reader comments, including the one above, represent solely the opinion or viewpoint of the readers that submitted them and do not represent the opinion or viewpoint of Gatestone Institute. Gatestone Institute takes no responsibility for the content of reader comments.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
The SPLC is the tip of the Iceberg that is sinking American Society [111 words]John W.Dec 10, 2016 14:39
The New Anti-Racist Racists [239 words]Peter TerryNov 4, 2016 16:29
This Isn't the First Time [336 words]VPBOct 31, 2016 17:48
Muslim Extremism? [200 words]James BoltonOct 30, 2016 13:40
We need to talk about Maajid [745 words]Ghost MachineOct 29, 2016 13:28
How does this make SPLC racists?! [106 words]John SevinsOct 29, 2016 11:05
Why I stopped donating to them [73 words]CarlOct 29, 2016 10:57
The End Point [30 words]Andrew BoughtonOct 28, 2016 15:14
Dark skinned KKK is OK [93 words]waljayOct 28, 2016 14:24
True but [58 words]MARTHAOct 28, 2016 13:03
Going over the top [163 words]jayellOct 28, 2016 11:53
Ideas in the mainstream [144 words]DAVID A FISHEROct 28, 2016 10:40
My Amazon Review of Majid Nawaz's book (for what it's worth). [182 words]BadgerOct 28, 2016 09:47
SPLC, self-appointed enforcer of Islamic blasphemy laws [277 words]Scott RoseOct 28, 2016 09:31
George Soros strikes again! [67 words]TomOct 28, 2016 09:13
Hypocrisy [77 words]ljOct 28, 2016 08:55
Moderate Muslims [136 words]jebOct 28, 2016 07:24
⇒ SPLC? Who Are You? Yet Another Nonentity! [292 words]Jeff PageOct 28, 2016 05:59
SPLC No longer get money from me [24 words]Albert ReingewirtzOct 28, 2016 05:49

Comment on this item

Email Address
Title of Comments

Note: Gatestone Institute greatly appreciates your comments. The editors reserve the right, however, not to publish comments containing: incitement to violence, profanity, or any broad-brush slurring of any race, ethnic group or religion. Gatestone also reserves the right to edit comments for length, clarity and grammar. All thoughtful suggestions and analyses will be gratefully considered. Commenters' email addresses will not be displayed publicly. Gatestone regrets that, because of the increasingly great volume of traffic, we are not able to publish them all.