We need to talk about Maajid

Reader comment on: The New Anti-Racist Racists

Submitted by Ghost Machine, Oct 29, 2016 13:28

Douglas, I don't know if you read these comments, but I really pray you do. Whilst always having had my suspicions, in recent days I have become convinced that Nawaz is not genuine. For me it seems clearer by the day that he is the same Islamist he always was, I find his new position on LBC to be extremely perturbing.

The current furor over the SPLC (in addition that is, to all the conservative Muslims who shun him) is a very convenient smokescreen to westerners who might have their doubts about his motives. He does not deserve to be on that list which I would consider a list of people I greatly admire for the most part- I'm disappointed you weren't on it!

I have read and listened to a lot of Nawaz has to say and found countless circumstantial examples of sentiments which don't quite add up, often conveying double messages and cultivating confusion regarding Islam to the people he is talking to.

On LBC for example, he spends a huge portion of the time discussing people's attitudes towards Muslims, without ever really discussing the ideas constituting the foundation of Islam, which in turn drive the behaviour and attitudes of Muslims. When inevitably challenged by listeners on Islam itself, he quickly shifts the focus to Muslims, saying something along the lines of: "So even if you're right, what would you do? Deport all 3 million Muslims in the UK?". Thus he shifts the debate from an ideological one to pseudo-racial one. The inevitable result is that the average listener will feel racist for even daring to voice concern over Islam. Truly scary.

Another fascinating example is the famous "Jesus and Mo" tweet. Notice that he chose a cartoon which shortens Mohammed's name to the point of ambiguity and never explicitly states that Mo is in fact Mohammed. In fact, according to one of the comics which deals with the subject Mo, claims to be a body double for obvious reasons. Used in this way, Maajid retains plausible deniability. Sure you could say that this was foolish as it turned many Muslims against him, but my argument is that his message isn't aimed at Muslims, but at us here in the west. The tweet said: "This Jesus & Mo @JandMo cartoon is not offensive&I'm sure GOD IS GREATER [my emphasis] than to feel threatened by it. This is followed by Allah Huakhbar in Arabic. So he's written Allah Hu Akhbar twice followed by a cartoon which purportedly goes against what most contemporary Muslims believe (if not the actual jurisprudence itself). The double message is clear- to those people who pick up on the fact that he isn't explicitly naming Mohammed he is signalling which side he is on.

In the messy aftermath of the tweet, not once does Nawaz ever explicitly state that the the cartoon was of the prophet Mohammed.

Other people have also voiced similar suspicions (https://vkchatterjee.wordpress.com/2016/03/20/sinister-and-dangerous-the-stealth-supremacism-of-maajid-nawaz/ for example- though I don't buy all of the arguments he makes), and it's their observations which aroused my suspicions even further.

I know you that you are personally very well acquainted with Nawaz, and whilst I obviously don't know your private thoughts on the man, I really hope you can at least give some thought to what I've written. I am fully aware of how ridiculous this all sounds on the surface, but the more I see and hear of him, the more I'm convinced I'm right. I've seen so many of your videos where you are the one presented as the extremist crackpot so I hope you will take what I've written seriously. I'm Jewish and half Israeli, so kind of sensitive to this whole scenario- after all, my future living in the UK depends on it. As a result I've read a great deal about the other precedents: CAIR, Aslan, Mehdi etc. I believe that Nawaz is just the latest and most effective iteration of this strategy.

p.s. I also don't understand the reason for the choice of person in naming his organisation- Quilliam, whose political views are described on Wikipedia thusly: "Quilliam argued that Muslims should not fight Muslims on behalf of European powers. He denounced British foreign policy in Sudan[15] and called for a worldwide Caliphate. It was as a result of his political views and his allegiance to the Ottoman Caliph that led some to denounce him as a traitor."

But I guess that's a conversation for another time...


Note: Reader comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. Gatestone Institute reserves the right to reject anything found to be objectionable. Reader comments, including the one above, represent solely the opinion or viewpoint of the readers that submitted them and do not represent the opinion or viewpoint of Gatestone Institute. Gatestone Institute takes no responsibility for the content of reader comments.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
The SPLC is the tip of the Iceberg that is sinking American Society [111 words]John W.Dec 10, 2016 14:39
The New Anti-Racist Racists [239 words]Peter TerryNov 4, 2016 16:29
This Isn't the First Time [336 words]VPBOct 31, 2016 17:48
Muslim Extremism? [200 words]James BoltonOct 30, 2016 13:40
⇒ We need to talk about Maajid [745 words]Ghost MachineOct 29, 2016 13:28
How does this make SPLC racists?! [106 words]John SevinsOct 29, 2016 11:05
Why I stopped donating to them [73 words]CarlOct 29, 2016 10:57
The End Point [30 words]Andrew BoughtonOct 28, 2016 15:14
Dark skinned KKK is OK [93 words]waljayOct 28, 2016 14:24
True but [58 words]MARTHAOct 28, 2016 13:03
Going over the top [163 words]jayellOct 28, 2016 11:53
Ideas in the mainstream [144 words]DAVID A FISHEROct 28, 2016 10:40
My Amazon Review of Majid Nawaz's book (for what it's worth). [182 words]BadgerOct 28, 2016 09:47
SPLC, self-appointed enforcer of Islamic blasphemy laws [277 words]Scott RoseOct 28, 2016 09:31
George Soros strikes again! [67 words]TomOct 28, 2016 09:13
Hypocrisy [77 words]ljOct 28, 2016 08:55
Moderate Muslims [136 words]jebOct 28, 2016 07:24
SPLC? Who Are You? Yet Another Nonentity! [292 words]Jeff PageOct 28, 2016 05:59
SPLC No longer get money from me [24 words]Albert ReingewirtzOct 28, 2016 05:49

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Gatestone Institute greatly appreciates your comments. The editors reserve the right, however, not to publish comments containing: incitement to violence, profanity, or any broad-brush slurring of any race, ethnic group or religion. Gatestone also reserves the right to edit comments for length, clarity and grammar. All thoughtful suggestions and analyses will be gratefully considered. Commenters' email addresses will not be displayed publicly. Gatestone regrets that, because of the increasingly great volume of traffic, we are not able to publish them all.