This Isn't the First Time

Reader comment on: The New Anti-Racist Racists

Submitted by VPB, Oct 31, 2016 17:48

The SPLC lists the American Family Association, part of the Family Resource Council, as an extremist group on their "watchlist." They actually gave this list to the US DoD a few years back to use as training so soldiers could spot groups and their followers to be wary of and to put on their own watchlists. https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/splc-urges-army-to-declare-american-family-association-an-extremist-group

Though SPLC lists several "horrible" comments from AFA staff, here is the one related to the topic at hand, which the SPLC labels as "offensive":
"[Islam] is, in fact, a religion of war, violence, intolerance, and physical persecution of non-Muslims."
–Tim Wildmon, March 6, 2012

Horrible, horrible Tim Wildmon. How dare you? (Sarcasm font)

But not only is the SPLC confused about who is "hateful," their designation is also causing hate.

The inclusion of the AFA on the SPLC list led a gunman to open fire at the Family Resource Council office building in Washington, DC. The gunman targeted the offices bc of the designation on the SPLC site. He showed up with a gun, and a backpack of Chic-fil-A sandwiches to smear in the victim's faces after he shot them. He was stopped by the security guard, who took a bullet, but likely saved the lives of dozens of people.

"That crime happened courtesy of Floyd Corkins and his Glock pistol, and his backpack filled with Chick-fil-A sandwiches. His target on August 15, 2012 was the FRC office in D.C., where Corkins admitted to authorities he wanted to "kill as many as I could." He was referring to Tony Perkins and his FRC employees...

Here's where it gets really good. Corkins told the FBI he used the SPLC's website as a source for choosing an "anti-gay" target, but SPLC co-founder Morris Dees declared that his organization was not responsible for the nine-millimeter bullet in the arm of Leo Johnson, the guard who stopped Corkins. Dees told CNS News that "having a group on our Hate Map doesn't cause anybody to attack them," even though Corkins said it did."


Note: Reader comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. Gatestone Institute reserves the right to reject anything found to be objectionable. Reader comments, including the one above, represent solely the opinion or viewpoint of the readers that submitted them and do not represent the opinion or viewpoint of Gatestone Institute. Gatestone Institute takes no responsibility for the content of reader comments.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
The SPLC is the tip of the Iceberg that is sinking American Society [111 words]John W.Dec 10, 2016 14:39
The New Anti-Racist Racists [239 words]Peter TerryNov 4, 2016 16:29
⇒ This Isn't the First Time [336 words]VPBOct 31, 2016 17:48
Muslim Extremism? [200 words]James BoltonOct 30, 2016 13:40
We need to talk about Maajid [745 words]Ghost MachineOct 29, 2016 13:28
How does this make SPLC racists?! [106 words]John SevinsOct 29, 2016 11:05
Why I stopped donating to them [73 words]CarlOct 29, 2016 10:57
The End Point [30 words]Andrew BoughtonOct 28, 2016 15:14
Dark skinned KKK is OK [93 words]waljayOct 28, 2016 14:24
True but [58 words]MARTHAOct 28, 2016 13:03
Going over the top [163 words]jayellOct 28, 2016 11:53
Ideas in the mainstream [144 words]DAVID A FISHEROct 28, 2016 10:40
My Amazon Review of Majid Nawaz's book (for what it's worth). [182 words]BadgerOct 28, 2016 09:47
SPLC, self-appointed enforcer of Islamic blasphemy laws [277 words]Scott RoseOct 28, 2016 09:31
George Soros strikes again! [67 words]TomOct 28, 2016 09:13
Hypocrisy [77 words]ljOct 28, 2016 08:55
Moderate Muslims [136 words]jebOct 28, 2016 07:24
SPLC? Who Are You? Yet Another Nonentity! [292 words]Jeff PageOct 28, 2016 05:59
SPLC No longer get money from me [24 words]Albert ReingewirtzOct 28, 2016 05:49

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Gatestone Institute greatly appreciates your comments. The editors reserve the right, however, not to publish comments containing: incitement to violence, profanity, or any broad-brush slurring of any race, ethnic group or religion. Gatestone also reserves the right to edit comments for length, clarity and grammar. All thoughtful suggestions and analyses will be gratefully considered. Commenters' email addresses will not be displayed publicly. Gatestone regrets that, because of the increasingly great volume of traffic, we are not able to publish them all.