London "Peace" Festival Organized by Terrorism Advocates
St. James Church supports the lie that the wall exists not to save Israeli lives but to subjugate Palestinian ones. Its replica of the security barrier has not managed to bring people together; it has only legitimized the extremism of the Holy Land Trust and the terror links of Interpal. In reality, it is Israel's security barrier that is an example of truly non-violent resistance.
Just off London's famous Piccadilly Circus stands St. James Church, a historic building designed by Christopher Wren and consecrated in 1684. Last week, upon this hallowed ground, St. James Church built an enormous 26-foot replica of Israel's security barrier, at a reputed cost of £30,000 ($50,000).
Visitors to the festival inscribe their messages on the replica wall.
The replica barrier is the main feature of a twelve-day festival organized by a coalition group called "Bethlehem Unwrapped." The festival is apparently "inspired by the cultural movement in Bethlehem known as 'Beautiful Resistance' in which Palestinians express their determination peacefully and creatively to resist injustice."
The organizers make no mention, however, of why the barrier was built: to save lives. As Hamas spokesperson Musa Abu Marzuq put it, when asked in 2007 by Egyptian politicians why suicide bombings had decreased since the Hamas government came to power: "carrying out such attacks is made difficult by the security fence and the gates surrounding the West Bank residents."
In a leaflet handed out to all visitors to the festival, Bethlehem Unwrapped "affirms its opposition to all forms of racism including anti-Semitism and supports the universal call for a just and sustainable solution for Palestinians and Israelis."
Further apologetics published on the Bethlehem Unwrapped website sermonize on the harmful symbolism of walls, along with platitudes about peace and love. A quote from one of the organizers of the festival tells us: "We have to not only understand those people who are oppressing us, but try to walk in their shoes, and ultimately to really engage with what it means to love our enemies."
The author of that entreaty is Sami Awad, director of the Holy Land Trust. It is in fact this charity to which "proceeds of the Bethlehem Unwrapped festival will be donated."
Awad claims to support "nonviolent resistance." He does not believe, however, that "nonviolent resistance" is an exclusive tool; support for such methods does not prelude the possibility of killing: "This is not a substitute for the armed struggle. This is not a method for normalization with the occupation. Our goal is to revive the popular resistance until every person is involved in dismantling the occupation."
In January 2011, Awad and his Holy Land Trust hosted Atallah Hanna, a Greek Orthodox Archbishop. Awad described Hanna as "inspiring." According to Christianity Today, Atallah Hanna has expressed support for suicide bombings:
"As you know, political parties in Palestine agree to the continuation of the intifada, which includes different approaches of struggle. Some freedom fighters adopt martyrdom or suicide bombing, while others opt for other measures. But all these struggles serve the continued intifada for freedom. Therefore, we support all these causes.
We are part of the intifada, so you don't expect us to keep distance and watch. We are in the struggle, whether it's martyrdom or any other means, we are part of it."
Furthermore, both Sami Awad and Atallah Hanna have voiced their support for Raed Saleh, an Islamist preacher who has claimed that 4,000 Jews skipped work at the World Trade Centre on 9/11, that those who killed the "Martyr, Sheikh Osama Bin Laden" had "sold their consciences to Satan," and that the honor killings of girls is acceptable.
Bethlehem Unwrapped is also supported by War on Want, a leading British charity which claims to fight poverty and injustice. War on Want however, helped to organize a series of speaking events in British Universities featuring Bongani Masuku -- whom the South African Human Rights Commission found to have wilfully incited violence between different student groups on campus.
War on Want's Director, John Hilary, has blamed Jews for criticizing War on Want by claiming that investigations into War on Want's activities were "part of an ongoing strategy by an organised pro-Israeli lobby and the Jewish press." In the past, Hilary has been happy to work with the Muslim Public Affairs Committee, an extremist Islamist group condemned by both the National Union of Students and a parliamentary committee for publishing anti-Semitic materials.
Bethlehem Unwrapped has been partly funded by Interpal, a British charity linked to the Palestinian terror group, Hamas. Bethlehem Unwrapped lists Interpal as a key supporter of the St. James Church festival.
Interpal was an inaugural member of the Union of Good, a coalition of charities that manages the financial support required by Hamas for its terrorist activities.
These links, which have been comprehensively detailed before, include recent Palestinian news footage showing Interpal's primary trustee, Essam Mustafa, attending a press conference hosted by Hamas to honor Interpal's work.
Interpal's other trustee, Ibrahim Hewitt, has referred to the "so-called Holocaust." In a pamphlet written by Hewitt, 'What Does Islam Say,' he advocates the killing of apostates and adulterers, and demanded that homosexuals suffer "severe punishments" for their "great sin."
Hewitt has boasted that the replica wall "cost quite a few thousand to put it together. Pleased to say that Interpal is one of the sponsors to raise awareness of the difficulties facing Palestinians under Israel's brutal military occupation."
Why has St. James Church chosen to consort with these supporters of terrorism? The Church claims the purpose of the replica wall, and of the Bethlehem Unwrapped festival, was to illustrate that, "bridges not walls are the only lasting foundation for peace" and that Bethlehem Unwrapped will "transform" the replica wall "into a symbol of peace and hope."
Instead, however, St. James Church supports the lie that the wall exists not to save Israeli lives but to subjugate Palestinian ones. Its replica of the wall has not managed to bring people together, it has only legitimized the extremism of the Holy Land Trust and the terror links of Interpal as voices of the Palestinian people.
The rector of St James, Lucy Winkett, has described the Bethlehem Unwrapped festival as part of "a peaceful Palestinian principle known as 'beautiful resistance'; expressed in theatres, music projects and festivals that exist to counter military dominance with a commitment to non-violent artistic expression."
In reality, it is Israel's security barrier that is an example of truly non-violent resistance. In 2007, it was credited with reducing terror attacks by 90% and the number of casualties from cross-border murders by 70%. Can the officials of St. James Church and all those other groups involved with Bethlehem Unwrapped even come close to a record like that?
Reader comments on this item
|I don't understand [21 words]||Valerie Sealey||Jan 15, 2014 13:02|
|Out of date infomation [75 words]||Tim Gilman||Jan 6, 2014 14:51|
|Palestine can end the conflict by embracing peace instead of Hamas. [40 words]||John K. Roberts||Jan 6, 2014 08:24|
|Walls [98 words]||Shirlee||Jan 5, 2014 23:37|
|Wall [16 words]||Mike H.||Jan 5, 2014 23:03|
|Out of touch with reality [84 words]||Ephesian||Jan 5, 2014 12:20|
|The West's "political correctness" barrier. [129 words]||Steven Buckley||Jan 5, 2014 10:23|
|London "Peace" Festival organized by terrorism advocates [297 words]||Angela||Jan 5, 2014 08:36|
|↔ Unwrapping hatred [155 words]||Sylvie Schapira||Jan 7, 2014 11:09|
|Bethlehem unwrapped [148 words]||Tommo||Jan 5, 2014 07:53|
|Excellent job. [239 words]||Terence Curry||Jan 5, 2014 06:01|
|The St.James's wall [127 words]||Dr. David Zuck||Jan 5, 2014 05:49|
|Just another example of the God bothering British attitude to Israel [70 words]||Bart Benschop||Jan 5, 2014 05:22|
|↔ British attitude [24 words]||Ephesian||Jan 11, 2014 02:32|
Comment on this item
by Khaled Abu Toameh
The "Arab Spring" did not erupt as a result of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Rather, it was the outcome of decades of tyranny and corruption in the Arab world. The Tunisians, Egyptians, Libyans and Yemenis who removed their dictators from power did not do so because of the lack of a "two-state solution." This is the last thing they had in mind.
The thousands of Muslims who are volunteering to join the Islamic State [IS] are not doing so because they are frustrated with the lack of progress in the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.
The only solution the Islamic State believes in is a Sunni Islamic Caliphate where the surviving non-Muslims who are not massacred would be subject to sharia law.
What Kerry perhaps does not know is that the Islamic State is not interested in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict at all. Unlike Kerry, Sunni scholars fully understand that the Islamic State has more to do with Islam and terrorism than with any other conflict.
by Steven J. Rosen
Palestinian officials have generally been silent about security cooperation with Israel. They are loath to acknowledge how important it is for the survival of the Palestinian Authority [PA], and fear that critics, especially Hamas, will consider it "collaboration with the enemy."
"You smuggle weapons, explosives and cash to the West Bank, not for the fight with Israel, but for a coup against the Palestinian Authority. The Israeli intelligence chief visited me two weeks ago and told me about the [Hamas] group they arrested that was planning for a coup... We have a national unity government and you are thinking about a coup against me." — Mahmoud Abbas, PA President, to Khaled Mashaal, Hamas leader.
According to Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon, if the IDF leaves the West Bank, Hamas will take over, and other terrorists groups such as the Islamic Jihad, Al-Qaeda and Islamic State would operate there.
In recent months, Abbas has been making a series of threats against Israel. If Abbas becomes another Arafat, it could be the Israeli side that loses interest in security cooperation.
by Burak Bekdil
It was the Islamists who, since they came to power in the 2000s, have reaped the biggest political gains from the "Palestine-fetish."
But the Turkish rhetoric on "solidarity" with our Palestinian brothers often seems askew to how solidarity should be.
by Raheel Raza
One blogger writes that Malala hates Pakistan's military. I believe it is the other way around.
I would so like to see the day when Malala is welcomed back in Pakistan, with the whole country cheering.
by Francesco Sisci
Democratic evolution in China was being seriously considered. The failures of U.S. support for democracy in Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt and Libya gave new food for thought to those opposed to democracy. Lastly, the United States did not strongly oppose the anti-democratic coup d'état that overthrew a democratically elected government in Thailand.
On the other hand, Russia -- dominated by Vladimir Putin, a new autocrat determined to stifle democracy in Russia -- provided a new model.
The whole of Eastern Europe and most of Latin America, formerly in the clutches of dictatorships, are now efficient democracies. This seems to indicate that while democracy cannot be parachuted into a country, there is a broader, longer-term global trend toward democracy and that its growth depends on local conditions.
As economic development needed careful planning, political reforms need even greater planning. The question remains: is China preparing for these political reforms?