The Palestinians' Israeli "Advisors"
What the Europeans and Americans are Funding
How come we didn't hear Beilin and his associates making a similar offer to Abbas before? They are inciting Abbas to achieve their own political goals: the removal of Benjamin Netanyahu from power.
Former Israeli minister and negotiator Yossi Beilin -- along with with a number of Israelis, including former army chief of staff Amnon Shahak and Zahav Gal'on, leader of the left-wing Meretz Party -- met this week in Ramallah with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and gave him some advice as how to deal with the Israeli government and the peace process.
The meeting in Ramallah came one day after Beilin called on Abbas to dismantle the Palestinian Authority so that Israel will be forced to manage the day-to-day affairs of the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip -- basically meaning the abrogation of the Oslo Accords, which the two men played a major role in creating two decades ago.
Beilin and his friends are, in fact, inciting Abbas against the Israeli government: they are encouraging him to resist American and European pressure and stay away from the peace talks with Israel.
The problem is that Beilin and his friends are doing so not out of concern or love for the Palestinians. They are, instead, inciting Abbas to achieve their own political goals: the removal of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from power.
But Beilin is not the only Israeli who regularly offers different types of advice to the Palestinians. The list of "advisors" consists of politicians, Knesset members, journalists and columnists and "peace activists."
If Beilin, his colleagues and associates really cared about the Palestinians, they would be urging Abbas to stay away from Hamas and return to the negotiations with Israel immediately and unconditionally. They would also be urging Abbas to implement large-scale reforms in the corruption-riddled Palestinian Authority and stop violations against human rights and freedom of expression in the areas under his control.
It would also be a good idea to advise Abbas to stop the indoctrination and incitement in the mosques, media and rhetoric of Palestinian officials -- which are causing tremendous damage to the peace process and relations between Jews and Arabs.
Beilin wants Abbas to disband the Palestinian Authority so that Israel will find itself in an embarrassing and difficult situation where it would be forced to resume direct control over nearly four million Palestinians. The advice to dissolve the Palestinian Authority is one that would plunge the whole Middle East into instability and pave the way for another round of violence. Such a move would only embolden the radicals among the Palestinians and other Arabs and confirm their argument that the entire peace process is nothing but a farce.
How come we did not hear Beilin and his associates making a similar offer to Abbas before, when Ehud Olmert and Tzipi Livni were in power in Israel? Most likely because Beilin and they share virtually the same positions and views as Olmert and Livni.
Nor is this a new phenomenon. Some of the "advisors" used to tell Yasser Arafat and his aides what to say to Israeli government officials and the Israeli public about different issues. Some of these "advisors," according to Palestinian sources, were on Arafat's payroll or benefited from funds provided by Americans and Europeans.
Abdel Karim Saleh is a London-based Jordanian journalist.
Comment on this item
by Bassam Tawil
What is sad is that the Gazans have not yet been able to free themselves from the yoke of Hamas.
The world seems not to understand that Hamas, like ISIS and the Muslim Brotherhood, does not exist in a vacuum. It is one cog in the radical Islamist wheel that threatens the Arab and Muslim world and the major cities of Europe.
The Western world also seems not to understand that it has to incapacitate or totally neutralize the countries funding terrorism, such as Iran, Qatar and Turkey, for whom the Palestinian problem is only a pretext on the way to destroying the Western world as we know it and replacing it with only Islam.
by Burak Bekdil
Hamas spokesman Sami Abu-Zuhri said: "All Israelis are legitimate targets." What would the Palestinian death toll have been if Mr. Netanyahu's spokesman declared all Palestinians as legitimate targets?
Underdog-nation romanticism tells us Israel should not respond when under rocket attack because it is capable of intercepting the rockets.
That there are fewer Israeli casualties does not mean Hamas does not want to kill; it just means, for the moment, Hamas cannot kill.
by Soeren Kern
Austria figures prominently in a map produced by the IS that outlines the group's five-year plan for expanding its caliphate into Europe, and has emerged as a central hub for jihadists seeking to fight in Syria.
"The spectrum of recruits for the conflict in Syria is ethnically diverse. The motivation, however, appears to be uniformly jihadist." — Austrian intelligence agency BVT.
"Allah also gives you the opportunity to wage jihad in Austria." — Austrian jihadist Firas Houidi.
"We are proud that Allah has chosen us. We feel like lions." — Austrian jihadist Abu Hamza al-Austria.
by Khaled Abu Toameh
What Khaled Mashaal forgot to mention was that Hamas and the Islamic State do have at least one thing in common: they both carry out extrajudicial executions as a means of terrorizing and intimidating those who stand in their way or who dare to challenge their terrorism.
According to Hamas's logic, all members of the Palestinian Authority government are "traitors" who should be dragged to public squares to be shot by firing squads. According to the same logic, Mahmoud Abbas himself should be executed for maintaining security coordination with and talking to Israelis.
As for the two executed women, the sources said that their only fault was that they had been observed asking too many questions about Palestinians who were killed in airstrikes.
by Stephen Blank and Peter Huessy
It now appears that the plan was for these terrorists to shoot down a Russian passenger flight over the Ukraine in order to create a casus belli [cause for war].
Putin repeatedly claims that Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons as a "de-escalatory measure" even against non-nuclear states.
The evidence that this war was preplanned is overwhelming. The planning for this Ukrainian operation started in 2006, when Putin offered to "guarantee Crimea's territory."
The forces fighting in Kiev consist not mainly of "separatists" or rebels, but of trained Russian army, intelligence and paramilitary officers, as well as Russian and some Ukrainian "volunteers" recruited by Moscow.
Putin would incite disturbances in Crimea, then graciously offer to take over Crimea to solve the problems.
For the Russians, and particularly for Putin, Ukraine can have no future other than as a Russian colony. This is indeed a phased invasion of Ukraine. The U.S. did not accept Russian aggression before; it should not accept it now.