The Palestinians' Israeli "Advisors"
What the Europeans and Americans are Funding
How come we didn't hear Beilin and his associates making a similar offer to Abbas before? They are inciting Abbas to achieve their own political goals: the removal of Benjamin Netanyahu from power.
Former Israeli minister and negotiator Yossi Beilin -- along with with a number of Israelis, including former army chief of staff Amnon Shahak and Zahav Gal'on, leader of the left-wing Meretz Party -- met this week in Ramallah with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and gave him some advice as how to deal with the Israeli government and the peace process.
The meeting in Ramallah came one day after Beilin called on Abbas to dismantle the Palestinian Authority so that Israel will be forced to manage the day-to-day affairs of the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip -- basically meaning the abrogation of the Oslo Accords, which the two men played a major role in creating two decades ago.
Beilin and his friends are, in fact, inciting Abbas against the Israeli government: they are encouraging him to resist American and European pressure and stay away from the peace talks with Israel.
The problem is that Beilin and his friends are doing so not out of concern or love for the Palestinians. They are, instead, inciting Abbas to achieve their own political goals: the removal of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from power.
But Beilin is not the only Israeli who regularly offers different types of advice to the Palestinians. The list of "advisors" consists of politicians, Knesset members, journalists and columnists and "peace activists."
If Beilin, his colleagues and associates really cared about the Palestinians, they would be urging Abbas to stay away from Hamas and return to the negotiations with Israel immediately and unconditionally. They would also be urging Abbas to implement large-scale reforms in the corruption-riddled Palestinian Authority and stop violations against human rights and freedom of expression in the areas under his control.
It would also be a good idea to advise Abbas to stop the indoctrination and incitement in the mosques, media and rhetoric of Palestinian officials -- which are causing tremendous damage to the peace process and relations between Jews and Arabs.
Beilin wants Abbas to disband the Palestinian Authority so that Israel will find itself in an embarrassing and difficult situation where it would be forced to resume direct control over nearly four million Palestinians. The advice to dissolve the Palestinian Authority is one that would plunge the whole Middle East into instability and pave the way for another round of violence. Such a move would only embolden the radicals among the Palestinians and other Arabs and confirm their argument that the entire peace process is nothing but a farce.
How come we did not hear Beilin and his associates making a similar offer to Abbas before, when Ehud Olmert and Tzipi Livni were in power in Israel? Most likely because Beilin and they share virtually the same positions and views as Olmert and Livni.
Nor is this a new phenomenon. Some of the "advisors" used to tell Yasser Arafat and his aides what to say to Israeli government officials and the Israeli public about different issues. Some of these "advisors," according to Palestinian sources, were on Arafat's payroll or benefited from funds provided by Americans and Europeans.
Abdel Karim Saleh is a London-based Jordanian journalist.
Comment on this item
by Alan M. Dershowitz
by Khaled Abu Toameh
There is growing concern in Ramallah, Cairo, Riyadh and Dubai that the U.S. Administration is working to prevent the collapse of Hamas.
"The Americans mistakenly think that moderate political Islam, which is represented by the Muslim Brotherhood, will be able to combat radical Islam. The Americans are trying to bring the Muslim Brotherhood back to the region." — Palestinian official, Ramallah.
The Iranians, with whom the U.S. is now negotiating on nuclear weapons -- amid fears in the Middle East that the U.S. will capitulate to Tehran's demands if it has not effectively capitulated to them already -- have now joined Qatar and Turkey in opposing any attempt to confiscate Hamas's weapons.
The Paris conference was actually a spit in the face to the anti-Hamas forces in the Arab world. By failing to invite the Palestinian Authority to the conference, Kerry indicated that he does not see any role for Abbas and his loyalists in a post-Hamas Gaza Strip.
by Amir Taheri
According to Küntzel, German leaders have at least two other reasons for helping Iran defy the United States. The first is German resentment of defeat in the Second World War followed by foreign occupation, led by the US. The second reason is that Iran is one of the few, if not the only country, where Germans have never been looked at as "war criminals" because of Hitler.
by Malcolm Lowe
Go to Nazareth and you can easily find the mini-mosque. It displays a large poster of Koran quotations denigrating Christianity and urging Christians to convert to Islam.
Overlooked is a fundamental difference between the two regimes. Israel is a state governed by the rule of law. The Palestinian Authority, like most other states in the region, is a personal dictatorship. Arafat started the fashion of simply disregarding the laws.
What is needed in Israel is a central policy unit with the brief of developing long-term policies both to integrate Israeli Christians and to engage with the great variety of Christians in foreign countries.
by Peter Huessy
The Washington Post's Glenn Kessler not only invents points the Cheneys did not make, he then casually dismisses "uncomfortable points" they did make. How many Pinocchios is that worth?
Kessler evidently assumes that when intelligence assessments differ, the correct version is only that which differs from the points made by the Cheneys but not by their critics.
Most senior Democratic members of the Senate at the time voted -- twice -- for giving the President the authority to take down Saddam Hussein. How else can Democrats say they made a mistake voting for the war if they cannot now make the case that they were "fooled"?
The U.S. took down Saddam Hussein's regime because on balance the threat-intelligence could not be ignored.