France, the Sick Man of Europe
Hollande's plans to bash the rich have failed to make him popular with the traditional Socialist electorate. After barely nine months in office, Hollande has lost popularity at an even faster rate then his predecessor, Sarkozy.
France is the sick man of Europe -- at least, that is how the French themselves apparently see it. Last month, a survey published in the leading newspaper, Le Monde, found that a large majority of the French believe that France's economic power and cultural influence have declined over the past decade. One in every two Frenchmen seems to have lost hope, evidently convinced that the decline of France -- economic as well as cultural -- is "inevitable."
The French also seem to have lost faith in democracy. Le Monde described the survey's findings as "alarming." Three-quarters believe that French democracy is not working well. 62% believe that their politicians are corrupt. The survey indicated that authoritarianism is widely supported, by the Left as well as the Right. More than 70% of the French want a strong leader – a "real chef" – to restore order. So do, obviously, not only 97% of the Front National voters, but also an astonishing 98% of the voters of the center-right UMP, the party of former president Nicolas Sarkozy, and 70% of the voters of the governing socialist PS party of President François Hollande.
A quarter of the French want to withdraw from the European Union; two-thirds want to limit the EU's power and take a stronger stand in favor of France's own interests. A majority of the French favor economic protectionism; 70% are convinced there are too many foreigners in the country, and 62% no longer feel as at home in their own country as they used to. FN leader Marine Le Pen said the survey shows that "The French agree with us."
Dominique Reynié, a professor of political science at the renowned Paris Institute of Political Studies [Sciences Po], describes the general sentiment, visible in the survey, as "ethno-Socialism." This is a Socialism that strives for Keynesian full employment and an elaborate social security system, underpinned by nationalist policies.
The survey also showed that 74% of the French consider Islam incompatible with French society, and 25% say that Judaism is incompatible with French society. Among the latter there might be a significant number of Muslims. Nevertheless, the figure is disconcertingly high. 11% consider Catholicism incompatible with French society.
According to the historian Michel Winock, another professor at Sciences Po, "the French are afraid." They are afraid of unemployment, economic decline, globalization, the EU, immigrants, Islam. They are suffering from a "profound despair," which makes them long for strong leadership. In 2007, they voted for Sarkozy in the hope that he would be this strong leader. Last year, they voted for Hollande who promised a national resurgence. In both cases, they were sorely disappointed.
The national malaise also visible in the survey can be seen elsewhere in French society as well. The French are depressed: they are the world's largest consumers of anti-depressants -- twice as much as their English neighbors and three times as much as their German neighbors.
The feelings of national depression were not eased when two weeks ago Michel Sapin, the French Minister of Labor, said in a radio interview that the French state was "totally bankrupt." Though technically not officially bankrupt yet, France has five major financial headaches.
First, there is the rising government debt. Between 1974, when Valéry Giscard d'Estaing became President of France, and today, France's national debt rose from 21% to 90% of GDP. This year, interest payments on government debt amount to €45 billion, the largest item in government expenditure, and higher than the total education budget.
Second, there is the pension problem. France has a pay-as-you-go pension system. In order to keep future pensions payable, the French government either has to raise the working population's pension contributions by 1.1%, cut actual pensions by 5%, or raise the retirement age, currently at 60, by 9 months. Last June, President Hollande cut the retirement age from 62 to 60, reversing the raise introduced by his predecessor Sarkozy in 2010. Minister Sapin, a pragmatic Socialist, opposed this move, but Hollande felt compelled to fulfill his electoral promises.
Third, there is the labor market. 18% of France's active population is unemployed. Over half a million people have been out of work for more than three years. Three years ago, fewer than 300.000 people were in this situation. Wage costs are too high, productivity is dropping, and talented people are leaving France to work abroad.
Fourth, France is also suffering from a huge export deficit. In 2011, its trade deficit was €73 billion. Compared to neighboring Germany's surplus of €150 billion, France is in seriously bad shape.
Finally, public expenditure has run out of control. Each year, the French state spends €1 trillion on public services. The French tax burden is 56.3%, which makes it the second highest in the world, after Sweden. Instead of lowering taxes to stimulate the economy, President Hollande is doing exactly the opposite. Last year, he announced that he would raise France's top income tax rate from 48% to 75% for incomes above €1 million. Last December, France's Constitutional Court annulled this measure, but in response to Hollande's plans, many wealthy French have already fled the country.
Hollande's plans to bash the rich have, however, failed to make him popular with the traditional Socialist electorate. A poll last December showed that only a third of French laborers still back him. After barely nine months in office, Hollande has lost popularity at an even faster rate than his predecessor, Sarkozy; perhaps he, too, will turn out to be among the many French currently on anti-depressants.
Reader comments on this item
|Not just France [21 words]||Morgan||Feb 14, 2013 20:36|
Comment on this item
by Alan M. Dershowitz
by Pierre Rehov
For terrorists, the death of innocent children is irrelevant. In a society that promotes martyrdom as the ultimate sign of success, the death of innocent children can sometimes even be seen as a public relations blessing.
In every action, intent is paramount. There should never be a moral equivalence painted between the deliberate killing of civilians, and a retaliation that tragically leads to casualties among civilians.
There is, however, one small difference: in the Middle East, reporters are threatened, except in Israel. Their choice becomes a simple one: promote the Palestinian point of view or stop working in the West Bank. Keep the eye of the camera dirty or lose your job. This show should not go on.
by Khaled Abu Toameh
Since 1948, the Arab countries and government have been paying mostly lip service to the Palestinians.
"They have money and oil, but don't care about the Palestinians, even though we are Arabs and Muslims like them. What a Saudi or Qatari sheikh spends in one night in London, Paris or Las Vegas could solve the problem of tens of thousands of Palestinians." — Palestinian human rights activist.
"Some Arabs were hoping that Israel would rid them of Hamas." — Ashraf Salameh, Gaza City.
"Some of the Arab regimes are interested in getting rid of the resistance in order to remove the burden of the Palestinian cause, which threatens the stability of their regimes." — Mustafa al-Sawwaf, Palestinian political analyst.
"Most Arabs are busy these days with bloody battles waged by their leaders, who are struggling to survive. These battles are raging in Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Egypt, Libya and the Palestinian Authority." — Mohammed al-Musafer, columnist.
"The Arab leaders don't know what they want from the Gaza Strip. They don't even know what they want from Israel." — Yusef Rizka, Hamas official.
by Soeren Kern
European elites, who take pride in viewing the EU as a "postmodern" superpower, have long argued that military hard-power is illegitimate in the 21st century. Unfortunately for Europe, Russia (along with China and Iran) has not embraced the EU's fantastical soft-power worldview, in which "climate change" is now said to pose the greatest threat to European security.
For its part, the European Commission, the EU's administrative branch, which never misses an opportunity to boycott institutions in Israel, has issued only a standard statement on the shooting down of MH17 in Ukraine, which reads: "The European Union will continue to follow this issue very closely."
The EU has made only half-hearted attempts to develop alternatives to its dependency on Russian oil and gas.
by Shoshana Bryen
Proportionality in international law is not about equality of death or civilian suffering, or even about [equality of] firepower. Proportionality weighs the necessity of a military action against suffering that the action might cause to enemy civilians in the vicinity.
"Under international humanitarian law and the Rome Statute, the death of civilians during an armed conflict, no matter how grave and regrettable does not constitute a war crime.... even when it is known that some civilian deaths or injuries will occur. A crime occurs if there is an intentional attack directed against civilians (principle of distinction) or an attack is launched on a military objective in the knowledge that the incidental civilian injuries would be clearly excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage (principle of proportionality)." — Luis Moreno-Ocampo, Chief Prosecutor, International Criminal Court.
"The greater the military advantage anticipated, the larger the amount of collateral damage -- often civilian casualties -- which will be "justified" and "necessary." — Dr. Françoise Hampton, University of Essex, UK.