The New Palestinian "Journalists"
Translations of this item:
Silence only prompted more hostility.
Many new "journalists" are political activists disguised as journalists, and full of hatred. They see themselves as foot soldiers in a revolution. They are giving journalism, and especially Palestinian journalism, a bad name.
An Israeli journalist, Avi Issacharoff, who has been covering Palestinian affairs for over a decade, reported that he and his cameraman were nearly lynched by a Palestinian mob as they tried to cover a Palestinian demonstration in the town of Beitunia, near Ramallah, on May 16.
Issacharoff said the attack began when a Palestinian female journalist incited masked Palestinian men against him and his cameraman.
"One of the Palestinian journalists, a young woman, then called over to a group of masked men, who swiftly surrounded me and began attacking me," Issacharoff said.
He said that were it not for the intervention of two Palestinian Authority security agents, his friend and he would have been beaten to death by the masked men.
"They extradited me and my colleague, and got us to safety," he added. "I dread to think what would have happened if they hadn't been there."
Rioting Palestinians hurl rocks at Israelis near the town of Beitunia in February 2013. (Image source: Noam Moskovich / The Israel Project)
The attack on Issacharoff and his friend did not come as a surprise to those who have been following the campaign waged by some Palestinian journalists against their Israeli colleagues during the past year.
The campaign began last year when some 200 Palestinian journalists signed a petition calling on the Palestinian Authority leadership to ban Israeli newsmen from entering Palestinian territories.
In April 2013, Gatestone ran an article about the campaign against the Israeli journalists. The article was entitled, "Palestinian Journalists Declare War On Israeli Colleagues."
This item, however, was ignored by the mainstream media in the West and even by most Israeli media outlets.
Israeli journalists explained back then that they preferred not to report about the threats against them so as not to escalate tensions with their Palestinian colleagues.
The Palestinian Authority leadership chose to ignore the threats against the Israeli journalists; the silence only prompted more hostility. The Palestinian journalists stepped up their campaign.
At one point, some Palestinian journalists outspokenly started inciting against their Israeli colleagues.
"Israeli journalists are soldiers with press cards," wrote journalist Akram Natsheh. "The Israeli media is an essential part of the Israeli army and even serves as its mouthpiece."
The Palestinian Journalists Syndicate, in a letter to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, called for banning Israeli journalists from entering Palestinian territories. The syndicate also demanded that the Palestinian Authority refrain from providing any kind of assistance or protection to the Israeli reporters.
Despite the threats, some Israeli journalists continued to show up in Ramallah and other Palestinian cities and villages, thereby exposing themselves to threats and physical assaults at the hands of Palestinian journalists and activists.
Even Palestinian journalists working for Israeli or Jewish media organizations found themselves facing threats and attacks. In some instances, Palestinian journalists walked out of briefings by Palestinian Authority officials in Ramallah to protest against the presence of representatives of the Israeli media.
Last December, Israeli journalists who arrived in Bethlehem to cover Christmas celebrations were expelled from the city after complaints by a number of Palestinian journalists.
Last week, the campaign reached its peak with the attempted lynching of Issacharoff and his colleague near Ramallah. "The effort to kick Israeli journalists out of Palestinian Authority areas has created a violent incendiary atmosphere against us," he wrote. "Almost all of my Israeli colleagues have felt, on their flesh, unpleasant incidents, to put it mildly, of late. But on Friday, a certain red line was crossed. On Friday, the threats and the hostile atmosphere escalated into real violence and, in my case, to an attempt to lynch me."
Everyone knew that it was only a matter of time before the threats against Israeli journalists were translated into real violence.
Some Palestinian journalists have justified their campaign by arguing that comes in response to Israeli security restrictions that ban many of them from entering Israel. Others, however, have admitted that they simply do not want to see any Israeli inside their areas because accepting presence of even one would be a form of "normalization" with the "Zionist enemy."
In this regard, Hamas has been honest enough to state that it is opposed in principle, to any form of collaboration with the Israeli media. That is why Hamas has banned Palestinians from dealing with Israeli journalists.
The Palestinian Authority bears responsibility for failing to take action against those who are inciting against Israeli journalists working in its territories. Some Palestinian Authority officials have even inflamed the hostility by coming out in favor of the campaign against the Israeli journalists.
Unless these are exposed and reined in, more people — businessmen, tourists and journalists — are likely to lose their lives in Ramallah or Jenin.
In the good old days before the peace process began, 20 years ago, Israeli and Palestinian journalists used to cooperate, help and work with each other. But there is a new generation of Palestinian "journalists" who have been brainwashed to a point where they regard themselves as foot soldiers in a revolution. Many of them are political activists disguised as journalists, and full of hatred. They are giving journalism, and especially Palestinian journalism, a bad name.
The writing is still on the wall.
Reader comments on this item
|You would be no safer [50 words]||Perry||May 24, 2014 12:21|
|PA journalists no longer credible [84 words]||Ghostwriter||May 20, 2014 17:30|
|What do you expect? [272 words]||Bart Benschop||May 19, 2014 22:26|
|The New Palestinian "Journalists" [70 words]||Ora||May 19, 2014 16:32|
|Nothing really new [50 words]||Gary Katz||May 19, 2014 16:19|
|Propaganda winners [163 words]||John MacArthur||May 19, 2014 05:44|
Comment on this item
by Douglas Murray
If Ayaan Hirsi Ali is not qualified to speak about Islam, then who is? The answer is that the only figure they might accept is someone who does not make any criticisms of Islam.
Her criticisms are often raw because they are true. Able to do nothing about the truth, they try to silence the truth-teller.
by Nir Boms and Shayan Arya
Acknowledging the new ISIS danger while ignoring Iran's role in fomenting sectarian conflict in Syria and Iraq is not only shortsighted but dangerous. ISIS is not about to acquire nuclear capability, at least yet. Iran is.
If ISIS, a 25,000-strong militia, poses a serious threat, how can one disregard the 550,000-strong military of the soon-to-be nuclear Iranian regime?
The International Atomic Energy Agency issued a confidential report, which states that "little progress is being made," and that the Iran has implemented only three out of five nuclear transparency steps to which it had committed to completing before August 25. Does the West actually no longer view a nuclear Iran as a pressing threat?
by Shabnam Assadollahi
by Burak Bekdil
"Why are you running away, you sperm of Israel?" — President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, to a Muslim protestor.
"Being a sperm of Israel in Turkey means... to get used to living on hate speech, insults and curses every day; held accountable for every act of the Israeli government although you may never even have stepped foot in Israel; treated as a 'foreigner' in the country where you were born, served in the military and you pay taxes." — Vedat Haymi Behar, digital marketing solutions coordinator, in Radikal.
by Malcolm Lowe
The losers are declaring war on all who disagree with them. They have adopted Salmond's attempts to pit one part of the population against another: not just young against old, but manual workers against the middle classes, city slum dwellers against country people, men against women, any section of the population that preferred Yes against another section that did the opposite.
The foolish devotion of Labour councilors to Palestinian militancy paved the way for nationalist mania.