Reader comment on: Converting Denmark into a Muslim Country
Submitted by Valhalla, Nov 21, 2012 09:39
The Danish people are finding out too late what was very obvious to those looking on: they have allowed themselves to be invaded and colonised by Islam, and these Muslims have no intention of ever assimilating. They can't, as their first and only allegiance is to Islam. Migration is the problem allowing too many, as Abdul is allowed four wives. He sets them up in their own homes; they collect single mothers payments; have six to nine children each; and they all bludge on the social security. They have it made. England doesn't allow polygamy but recognises and pays for this practice.
They are starting to show their true colours, as they have the numbers in the Danish Parliament and allow their Eid celebrations; their cruel, inhumane slaughter of the animals and denying Christmas to the Danes. How did they not see this coming? The same is happening in England, France, and Germany: this is creeping Sharia. The rate they are coming into our country - Australia -is by the hundreds. This is weekly, mainly from Islamic countries. We will soon be in the same position if out migrant vote seeking government doesn't wake up. Money is being taken from our poor and homeless to give to these bludgers, who turn on us once they get a job and home.
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. This site reserves the right to reject anything found to be objectionable.
Other reader comments on this item
|Something must be done [61 words]||European||Jan 26, 2014 10:06|
|↔ The transformation of a once great nation into a stinking hellhole [68 words]||Chairman of the board||Apr 9, 2014 01:01|
|Time to take action [160 words]||Flurby||Jan 21, 2014 01:11|
|How many Muslim countries allow migration? [24 words]||John||Nov 14, 2013 13:50|
|↔ The Muslims are harmless [143 words]||Husein Ali||Jan 23, 2014 11:06|
|People don't sell or rent their land/homes to Muslims in many countries [71 words]||Donald||Oct 22, 2013 09:55|
|Jesus must help us! [126 words]||Kate||Apr 14, 2013 14:22|
|Looking at the numbers... [29 words]||Billy O'Shea||Mar 1, 2013 19:12|
|Not a clash of religions [166 words]||Graham Cooke||Nov 28, 2012 19:45|
|↔ Our Hurt is with You, Denmark [110 words]||Elizabeth||Mar 18, 2013 05:09|
|↔ Answer [41 words]||Kате||Apr 14, 2013 14:47|
|Danish people are too soft [267 words]||Bente Roe||Nov 28, 2012 07:06|
|↔ Reply to Bente Roe [62 words]||Billy O'Shea||Mar 1, 2013 19:08|
|↔ Denmark/Danish people are just too nice [172 words]||Sanz||May 30, 2013 06:11|
|↔ Danish people are too soft [8 words]||Pamela||Jul 27, 2013 17:57|
|Charity [45 words]||Pongidae Rex||Nov 27, 2012 13:30|
|Reverse course now or disappear forever [35 words]||Mikhael||Nov 24, 2012 23:26|
|↔ Better start learning your Koran [29 words]||Artem||Nov 27, 2012 10:06|
|Reaping what they sow [101 words]||Apollyon||Nov 23, 2012 11:52|
|Just hot pathetic [100 words]||Timmy||Nov 22, 2012 22:37|
|Denmark is acquiescing to and enabling an Islamic Denmark [152 words]||Charles Stein||Nov 22, 2012 13:16|
|↔ Enemy identities [31 words]||M'aidez||Nov 24, 2012 19:46|
|Stop Sharia [74 words]||Heapologia||Nov 22, 2012 05:10|
|Difficult Issues demand new thinking [360 words]||Non-European||Nov 21, 2012 15:33|
|Denmark will be the new Kosovo [193 words]||Ziu||Nov 21, 2012 13:39|
|↔ Deal with your Gandhi before it's too late [46 words]||Dev||Nov 24, 2012 06:56|
|What Europe suggested for Israel is being returned unto them: Happy Eid! [12 words]||Bernard Ross||Nov 21, 2012 13:21|
|Wake up [40 words]||Seriously||Nov 21, 2012 11:12|
|Muslim take over [48 words]||Guy Macher||Nov 21, 2012 09:52|
|⇒ Creeping Sharia [220 words]||Valhalla||Nov 21, 2012 09:39|
|First Islamic European state? [36 words]||Jonathan Danilowitz||Nov 21, 2012 07:58|
|↔ Now you see what Islam is [34 words]||Paul McAuley||Jun 20, 2013 17:01|
|Now you see what Islam is [67 words]||Amir||Nov 21, 2012 05:51|
Comment on this item
by Alan M. Dershowitz
by Pierre Rehov
For terrorists, the death of innocent children is irrelevant. In a society that promotes martyrdom as the ultimate sign of success, the death of innocent children can sometimes even be seen as a public relations blessing.
In every action, intent is paramount. There should never be a moral equivalence painted between the deliberate killing of civilians, and a retaliation that tragically leads to casualties among civilians.
There is, however, one small difference: in the Middle East, reporters are threatened, except in Israel. Their choice becomes a simple one: promote the Palestinian point of view or stop working in the West Bank. Keep the eye of the camera dirty or lose your job. This show should not go on.
by Khaled Abu Toameh
Since 1948, the Arab countries and government have been paying mostly lip service to the Palestinians.
"They have money and oil, but don't care about the Palestinians, even though we are Arabs and Muslims like them. What a Saudi or Qatari sheikh spends in one night in London, Paris or Las Vegas could solve the problem of tens of thousands of Palestinians." — Palestinian human rights activist.
"Some Arabs were hoping that Israel would rid them of Hamas." — Ashraf Salameh, Gaza City.
"Some of the Arab regimes are interested in getting rid of the resistance in order to remove the burden of the Palestinian cause, which threatens the stability of their regimes." — Mustafa al-Sawwaf, Palestinian political analyst.
"Most Arabs are busy these days with bloody battles waged by their leaders, who are struggling to survive. These battles are raging in Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Egypt, Libya and the Palestinian Authority." — Mohammed al-Musafer, columnist.
"The Arab leaders don't know what they want from the Gaza Strip. They don't even know what they want from Israel." — Yusef Rizka, Hamas official.
by Soeren Kern
European elites, who take pride in viewing the EU as a "postmodern" superpower, have long argued that military hard-power is illegitimate in the 21st century. Unfortunately for Europe, Russia (along with China and Iran) has not embraced the EU's fantastical soft-power worldview, in which "climate change" is now said to pose the greatest threat to European security.
For its part, the European Commission, the EU's administrative branch, which never misses an opportunity to boycott institutions in Israel, has issued only a standard statement on the shooting down of MH17 in Ukraine, which reads: "The European Union will continue to follow this issue very closely."
The EU has made only half-hearted attempts to develop alternatives to its dependency on Russian oil and gas.
by Shoshana Bryen
Proportionality in international law is not about equality of death or civilian suffering, or even about [equality of] firepower. Proportionality weighs the necessity of a military action against suffering that the action might cause to enemy civilians in the vicinity.
"Under international humanitarian law and the Rome Statute, the death of civilians during an armed conflict, no matter how grave and regrettable does not constitute a war crime.... even when it is known that some civilian deaths or injuries will occur. A crime occurs if there is an intentional attack directed against civilians (principle of distinction) or an attack is launched on a military objective in the knowledge that the incidental civilian injuries would be clearly excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage (principle of proportionality)." — Luis Moreno-Ocampo, Chief Prosecutor, International Criminal Court.
"The greater the military advantage anticipated, the larger the amount of collateral damage -- often civilian casualties -- which will be "justified" and "necessary." — Dr. Françoise Hampton, University of Essex, UK.