New War Ahead?
Reader comment on: New War Ahead: China-Pakistan vs. U.S.A.
Submitted by R. Kumar (United Kingdom), May 25, 2011 12:20
In its wisdom for the very long and real economic interests, China will not want to have a war on its hands because that would hurt the bank balance. So, I don't see any war! In the meantime, one player will continue to play the role of a surrogate ally!
Note: Reader comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. Gatestone Institute reserves the right to reject anything found to be objectionable. Reader comments, including the one above, represent solely the opinion or viewpoint of the readers that submitted them and do not represent the opinion or viewpoint of Gatestone Institute. Gatestone Institute takes no responsibility for the content of reader comments.
Other reader comments on this item
|A Dangerous Thing [50 words]||Ussaid||Aug 13, 2013 12:39|
|China Pakistan strategic relations [17 words]||Shahid||Nov 27, 2012 04:13|
|China against India [41 words]||Pankaj||Jan 17, 2012 11:49|
|China vs. US [92 words]||Daniel||Jul 30, 2011 15:21|
|↔ Pakistan should be wary of India [191 words]||Raza Khan||Dec 2, 2013 12:40|
|↔ Hypocricy of Raza Khan [65 words]||Brave Rana||Feb 10, 2014 01:31|
|↔ Ignorance of brave Rana [328 words]||Junaild Abbasi||Feb 19, 2014 14:36|
|Good [10 words]||Ms. Marwat||Jul 25, 2011 00:40|
|Great, but how did it start?! [28 words]||Robert Ayre||Jul 11, 2011 19:14|
|I disagree [71 words]||Casual||Jun 21, 2011 23:55|
|Where do you get your facts from? [55 words]||Sean||Jun 18, 2011 17:25|
|Not good [97 words]||Anomymouls||May 28, 2011 22:21|
|⇒ New War Ahead? [50 words]||R. Kumar||May 25, 2011 12:20|
|Gilgit-Baltistan [86 words]||K||May 23, 2011 20:30|
|War [60 words]||Zubair||May 13, 2011 16:54|
Comment on this item
by Daniel Pipes
CAIR should be treated as a marginal and despised group like the Ku Klux Klan or the Nation of Islam.
by Khaled Abu Toameh
A third reason Abbas still does not trust Hamas is the revelation this week that that the Islamist movement had planned to overthrow his regime in the West Bank. Even if the Palestinian Authority were to return to the Gaza Strip, Hamas, Islamic Jihad and other terrorist groups would not disappear.
This is precisely what Hamas wants, a weak Palestinian authority that would manage the day-to-day affairs of the Palestinians and pay salaries to tens of thousands of employees, while the Islamist movement and its allies continue to smuggle weapons and prepare for the next war with Israel.
Such a scenario would only strengthen Hamas: it would absolve it of it responsibilities toward the residents of Gaza Strip by laying the burden on the Palestinian Authority.
by Shoshana Bryen
Both the president and Mr. Kerry took pains to sever ISIS from the religion of Islam. But ISIS speaks precisely in Islamic terms and holds itself out to be authentic Islam.
The goals of Hamas and the goals of ISIS, to create a society on its own principles -- "ugly, savage, inexplicable, nihilistic and valueless evil," to quote Mr. Kerry -- are the same.
by Alan M. Dershowitz
by George Igler
"There is a direct link between politicians saying things and people being emboldened to go and attack Jews." — Jonathan Arkush, Vice-President, UK Board of Deputies.
It is never the person who commits these sorts of crimes that is held morally responsible by Britain's media or politicians. That honor is reserved for a nation over 2,000 miles away, Israel.
What if Christians objecting to the genocide being carried out by ISIS in Iraq, say, went around in mobs violently menacing Muslim businesses?