The Order for Beatings Came From Abbas's Office
If Abbas endorses the findings of the Palestinian commission of inquiry and takes action against the officials who ordered the beatings, he will send a message to his constituents which reassures them that no one is above the law, and that he cares about freedom of media and human rights. But any attempt to sweep the findings under the carpet will show that the talk about transparency and accountability in the Palestinian Authority is not serious and will play into the hands of Hamas.
A Palestinian commission of inquiry into the beating of Palestinian journalists and demonstrators in Ramallah has found that top officials in Mahmoud Abbas's office had ordered the assault.
The discovery did not come as a surprise to many Palestinians, who have long been accusing the Palestinian leadership in the West Bank of waging a campaign of intimidation and terror against journalists, bloggers and political opponents.
Western donors who are funding the Palestinian Authority are willing to turn a blind eye to human rights violations as long as Abbas and his aides remain "committed to the two-state solution" and do not believe in violence against Israel, as a Western diplomat based in Israel explained.
The commission of inquiry was established after Palestinian policemen and security personnel -- in civilian clothes -- attacked Palestinians who were demonstrating several weeks ago against a planned visit to Ramallah by then Israeli Vice Prime Minister Shaul Mofaz.
Mofaz was scheduled to meet with Abbas to discuss ways of reviving the stalled peace process; however, the protests that erupted in Ramallah forced Abbas to cancel the meeting with Mofaz.
The demonstrations -- most of whom were young men and women protesting not only Mofaz's planned visit, but also Abbas's failed policies, especially in combating financial and administrative corruption --were seen as a huge embarrassment to Abbas and his inner circle.
The protesters had also demanded an end to the ongoing violations of freedom of speech and abuses of human rights by the Palestinian Authority.
Over the past few years, Abbas and his aides have repeatedly demonstrated intolerance toward criticism: Palestinians who have dared to speak out against dictatorship and corruption in the West Bank have often found themselves either behind bars or in hospital.
The Palestinian Authority has also been firing public servants who dare to disagree with Abbas or Prime Minister Salam Fayyad.
In recent years, for example, hundreds of school teachers were dismissed for "security reasons" -- a charge used against those who belong to rival political groups or who are not Abbas loyalists.
The commission of inquiry did not name the senior Palestinian officials who had issued the orders to the police to beat the journalists and peaceful protesters.
Yet many Palestinians in Ramallah said this week that they hold Abbas personally responsible for the assault. "If Abbas does not know what is happening inside his office, that's very serious," said a Palestinian human rights activist. "And if he knew what his officials were up to and approved of it, that is even more serious."
If, however, Abbas endorses the findings of the commission of inquiry and takes action against the officials who ordered the beatings, he will send a positive message to his constituents -- one that reassures them that no one is above the law and that he cares about freedom of media and human rights.
But any attempt to sweep the findings under the carpet will show that the talk about accountability and transparency in the Palestinian Authority is not serious. This choice, of course, will further play into the hands of Abbas's rivals, above all Hamas.
Reader comments on this item
|Thank you [15 words]||Alice||Aug 30, 2012 14:54|
Comment on this item
by Burak Bekdil
Where Turkey stands today is a perfect example of how, when Islamists -- mild or otherwise -- rule a county, even the most basic liberties are systematically suppressed.
"A climate of fear has emerged in Turkey." — Hasam Kilic, President, Turkey's Constitutional Court.
The prosecutor demanded a heavier penalty for the victim than for her torturers.
The European Commission identified government interference in the judiciary and bans imposed on social media as the major sources of concern regarding Turkey's candidacy for full membership.
by Khaled Abu Toameh
To understand what drives a young Palestinian to carry out such a deadly attack, one needs to look at the statements of Palestinian Authority leaders during the past few weeks.
The anti-Israel campaign of incitement reached its peak with Abbas's speech at the UN a few weeks ago, when he accused Israel of waging a "war of genocide" in the Gaza Strip. Abbas made no reference to Hamas's crimes against both Israelis and Palestinians.
Whatever his motives, it is clear that the man who carried out the most recent attack, was influenced by the messages that Abbas and the Palestinian Authority leadership have been sending their people.
by Richard Kemp
Would General Allen -- or any other general today -- recommend contracting out his country's defenses if it were his country at stake? Of course not.
The Iranian regime remains dedicated to undermining and ultimately destroying the State of Israel. The Islamic State also has Israel in its sights and would certainly use the West Bank as a point from which to attack, if it were open to them.
There can be no two-state solution and no sovereign Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan, however desirable those things might be. The stark military reality is that Israel cannot withdraw its forces from the West Bank.
Fatah leaders ally themselves with the terrorists of Hamas, and, like Hamas, they continue to reject the every existence of the State of Israel.
If Western leaders actually want to help, they should use all diplomatic and economic means to make it clear to the Palestinians that they will never achieve an independent and sovereign state while they remain set on the destruction of the State of Israel.
by Louis René Beres
The Palestine Liberation Organization [PLO], forerunner of today's Palestinian Authority, was founded in 1964, three years before Israel came into the unintended control of the West Bank and Gaza. What therefore was the PLO planning to "liberate"?
Why does no one expect the Palestinians to cease all deliberate and random violence against Israeli civilians before being considered for admission to statehood?
On June 30, 1922, a joint resolution of both Houses of Congress of the United States endorsed a "Mandate for Palestine," confirming the right of Jews to settle anywhere they chose between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. This is the core American legacy of support for a Jewish State that President Obama now somehow fails to recall.
A sovereign state of Palestine, as identified by the Arabs -- a Muslim land occupied by "Palestinian" Arabs -- has never existed; not before 1948, and not before 1967. From the start, it was, and continues to be, the Arab states -- not Israel -- that became the core impediment to Palestinian sovereignty.
by Timon Dias
It looks as if this new law is meant to serve as a severe roadblock to parties that would like to dismantle the EU in a democratic and peaceful way from within.
A rather dull semantic trick pro-EU figures usually apply, is calling their opponents "anti-Europe."