Libya: Restoring the Monarchy?
Translations of this item:
If the government fails... to assert its power in the months to come it will become a de facto Somalia II.... Soon, these militias, if they have not already done so, will have their own government that will contest the decisions of the paper government of Tripoli… Indicators show that it is already fragmenting into three countries." — Professor Mohamed Chtatou, University of Mohammed V, Morocco.
On the occasion of a preparatory meeting for the 25th summit of the Arab League in Kuwait, the Libyan government, on March 25, opened the debate on the restoration of the monarchy in the country. "The restoration of the monarchy [in Libya] is the solution that will guarantee the return to security and stability. Contacts have already been made, and we are in touch with dignitaries and tribal chiefs in Libya, and also with the grandson of King Al-Senussi, Prince Mohamed [Hasan Al-Rida Al-Senussi], who lives overseas," said the Libyan Foreign Minister, Mohamed Abdelaziz, during the meeting. He added that "many tribal sheikhs, who lived under monarchy and know it, prefer such a system of government."
In the aftermath of the Arab Spring, the fragmentation of the Libyan society has been particularly severe, and chances of the country's dissolution are high. Libyan Foreign Minister Abdelziz believes that the return of the Senussi rule -- the Senussi dynasty has always been considered a symbol of national unity -- may stabilize the country. Sidi Muhammad Idris Al-Senussi, the last king of Libya, ruled from 1951 to 1969, the year he was toppled by a military coup led by Libya's former dictator, Muammar Gaddafi.
King Idris I of Libya on the cover of Al Iza'a magazine, August 15, 1965, No.14. (Image source: Wikimedia Commons)
After the toppling of King Idris in 1969, Gaddafi imposed on the country 42 years of harsh and unstable dictatorship that did not build any much-needed national unity. The fall of Gaddafi did not bring any social peace. Tensions within the country are growing. Tribal confrontations, common delinquency and Islamist extremism are tearing the country apart. Dr. Mohamed Chtatou, Professor at the University of Mohammed V in Rabat, Morocco, wrote that if Libya does not find a national cohesion, it risks becoming a failed state like Somalia:
In Libya, there is a government that has, on paper, a police and an army, but this government exists only in Tripoli [the capital]; outside of the capital, the country is ruled by the militias. Actually, the Libyan example is very close to the Somali experience. If the government fails in the months to come to assert its power on all the Libyan territory, the country will become a de facto Somalia II, in the area. In principle, Libya is already another Somalia: the militias, in certain parts of the country, are already selling oil to foreign companies and pocketing the money. Soon, these militias, if they have not already done so, will have their own government that will contest the decisions of the paper government of Tripoli. Post-Qaddafi Libya is bent on becoming three countries or more if nothing is done on the part of the Tripoli paper government. Indicators show that it is slowly fragmenting into three countries: Cyrenaica, Tripolitania and Fezzan. The only bold initiative that could ultimately reverse this motion is the creation of a federal government that would delegate home affairs to local governments. Will the Libyan political class opt for that or go the way of the irreversible fragmentation?"
Under these circumstances, it is not surprising that the Libyan leadership imagined that the only way out of the present chaos was represented by the reinstatement of the Senussi dynasty, the only institution that, in the course of the young history of Libya, had ensured some sort of national sentiment and of security and stability.
In the meantime, the Libyan government recently issued a decree stipulating that the heirs of King Idris will regain their Libyan citizenship and can recover the property confiscated by former dictator Gaddafi. After the coup in 1969, the Senussi family was actually stripped of Libyan citizenship and thrown out of the country. King Idris died in exile in Egypt. The rest of the family, including Idris's grandnephew and heir-apparent, Mohamed Al-Senussi, received the status of political exile the United Kingdom.
The process of restoration of the monarchy, however, does not convince the Senussi family itself. In a recent interview to the BBC, Mohammed Al-Senussi, the heir-apparent, said that monarchy cannot work in post-revolutionary Libya, and added that he does not have any desire to rule the country.
According to Asharq Al-Awsat columnist Mishari Al-Zaydi, Prince Senussi is right to refrain from responding to such call, "not because the Senussi monarchy is not the solution, but because there are no guarantees of its success, and times have changed. ... there is no evidence that this nostalgia for the monarchy stems from deep-seated conviction."
"Similar calls [for the restoration of a monarchy] were made in Iraq following the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, and they appear every now and then in Egypt," according to Al-Zaydi.
In Libya, it seems unlikely that a monarchy might be a sort of magic wand capable of producing instant results on the social texture of Libya. It appears as though, after the many hopes raised by the Arab Spring, Libya, as many other Arab countries, is back at square one.
The Libyan government does not know how to come out of instability or stop the violence, and citizens are losing hope and respect for the institutions governing the country.
A Martyr Ministry employee, Ali Al-Houti, interviewed by the media outlet Magharebia, commented, "As far as I'm concerned, I accept even Libyan folklore artist Nadia Astar to rule Libya, as long as we get rid of these assassinations, bombings and concerns in the country."
 Magharebia.com, March 28, 2014
 King Idris inherited from his father the title of emir of Cyrenaica, the eastern coastal region where he was born. Idris' grandfather was Sayyid Muhammad ibn Ali Al-Senussi, also called the Grand Senussi, who founded in Mecca (Saudi Arabia) a political and religious Sufi order bearing the name of his family. Grand Senussi promoted his politico-religious movement across Libya, Egypt and other parts of North Africa. The Senussi movement fought French colonial expansion in the Sahara and the Italian colonization of Libya. Idris himself confronted the Italian colonial rule and supported the Allies against Nazi Germany, during WWII. After the war, the UN General Assembly announced that the future of the Libyan provinces - Cyrenaica, Fezzan, and Tripolitania - should be decided upon by representatives of the three areas in a national assembly. This assembly established a constitutional monarchy and a consensus was reached to offer the throne to Idris. The new king declared Libya's independence in December 1951.
 Morocco World News (Morocco), April 2, 2014
Asharq Al-Awsat (Saudi-owned, London-based), March 30, 2014
 Magharebia.com, March 28, 2014
Reader comments on this item
|Restoration of Monarchy [111 words]||Newton SABBÁ GUIMARÃES, Ph. D.||Jun 3, 2014 18:45|
Comment on this item
by Soeren Kern
Hamas would likely resort to violence to thwart any attempts to disarm the group. It is therefore highly unlikely the Europeans would confront Hamas in any meaningful way.
Spanish intelligence agents met secretly with Hezbollah operatives, who agreed to provide "escorts" to protect Spanish UNIFIL patrols. The quid pro quo was that Spanish troops would look the other way while Hezbollah was allowed to rearm for its next war with Israel. Hezbollah's message to Spain was: mind your own business.
If the European experience with Hezbollah in Lebanon is any indication, not only will Hamas not be disarmed, it will be rearmed as European monitors look on and do nothing.
What is clear is that European leaders have never been committed to honoring either the letter or the spirit of UN Resolutions 1559, 1680 and 1701, all of which were aimed at preventing Hezbollah from rearming.
by Debalina Ghoshal
According to former Bush administration official Stephen Rademaker, for the United States to respond to Russian violations of the treaty by pulling out of it would be "welcome in Moscow," which is "wrestling with the question of how they terminate [the treaty]" and thus, the United States should not make it easier for the Russians to leave.
by Guy Millière
Belgian security services have estimated that the number of European jihadists in Syria may be over 4000.
European leaders have directed their nastiest comments against the Jewish state, none of them has asked why Palestinian organizations in Gaza put their stockpiles of weapons in hospitals, homes, schools and mosques, or their command and control centers at the bottom of large apartment buildings or underneath hospitals. None of them has even said that Hamas is a terrorist organization despite its genocidal charter.
The majority of them are wedded to the idea of redistribution. Their policies are anti-growth, do not afford people any economic opportunity, and are what caused these economic crises in Europe in the first place. The United States seems to be following these thoroughly failed policies as well.
"Europe could not stay the same with a different population in it." — Christopher Caldwell, Reflections on the Revolution in Europe.
by Raymond Ibrahim
"I abducted your girls. I will sell them on the market, by Allah... There is a market for selling humans. Allah says I should sell." — Abubakar Shekau, leader of Boko Haram.
Hillary Clinton repeatedly refused to designate Boko Haram a terrorist organization.
In Malaysia -- regularly portrayed in the West as a moderate Muslim nation -- any attempt to promote religions other than Islam is illegal.
"The reason they want to kill me is very clear -- it is because of being a convert to Christianity." — Hassan Muwanguzi, Uganda.
by Dexter Van Zile
Rev. Hanna Massad does not mention that perhaps Hamas actually wants the blockade to end so it can bring in more weapons and cement to build attack-tunnels so it can "finish the job."
Hamas does not just admit to using human shields, it brags about using human shields. Why does Massad have to inject an air of uncertainty about Hamas's use of human shields when no such uncertainty exists?
The problem is that any self-respecting journalist would confront Massad with a follow-up question about Hamas's ideology and violence, but not the folks at Christianity Today.