Language of alliance or benefits
Reader comment on: Erdogan: "The Image of the Jews Is No Different from that of the Nazis"
Submitted by Yasmin (Finland), Feb 11, 2013 06:53
Recently I read the article, written by Soeren Kern, which points out the attempt to murder free speech in the borders of Denmark in particular and Europe in general. I believe that the article was covertly claiming Islam as one of the obstacles against the freedom of speech, and, although I am a Muslim Turkish woman, have thought that the point was quite reasonable and myself also felt worried about the situation, since I believe that freedom of speech is not a necessity: it is an obligation for human beings and should be like defined.
However, in my opinion, placing value to the freedom of speech on one side and on the other side limiting the freedom in the terminology of being an "ally" is confusing. Although I do not support Mr. Erdogan's every word or deed - and although I perceive his attitude too strong and direct in the matter by considering the customs of international relations - I still do think that he has the right to speak about the murders happening in Palestine. If being an "ally" makes us slient and blind to violence, then the language we speak is not the language of alliance anymore; it becomes the language of benefits.
Note: Reader comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. Gatestone Institute reserves the right to reject anything found to be objectionable. Reader comments, including the one above, represent solely the opinion or viewpoint of the readers that submitted them and do not represent the opinion or viewpoint of Gatestone Institute. Gatestone Institute takes no responsibility for the content of reader comments.
Other reader comments on this item
|Muslim hypocrites [31 words]||Aussiegirl||Feb 11, 2013 21:08|
|Erdogan's anti-American and anti-Semitic statements from 1993 [9 words]||Herb Glatter||Feb 11, 2013 10:14|
|Not aimed at Muslims [42 words]||Ethan P.||Feb 11, 2013 09:27|
|Turkey [62 words]||Jenka||Feb 11, 2013 07:24|
|Other quotes [497 words]||Jude||Feb 11, 2013 07:21|
|⇒ Language of alliance or benefits [205 words]||Yasmin||Feb 11, 2013 06:53|
|The more Islamists seem to change, the more they are the same. [152 words]||Jayson Rex||Feb 11, 2013 05:46|
Comment on this item
by Evelyn Markus
The charge of "Islamophobia" is being used to silence people, so that any opposition will be neutralized before it can even start.
by Daniel Pipes
CAIR should be treated as a marginal and despised group like the Ku Klux Klan or the Nation of Islam.
by Khaled Abu Toameh
A third reason Abbas still does not trust Hamas is the revelation this week that that the Islamist movement had planned to overthrow his regime in the West Bank. Even if the Palestinian Authority were to return to the Gaza Strip, Hamas, Islamic Jihad and other terrorist groups would not disappear.
This is precisely what Hamas wants, a weak Palestinian authority that would manage the day-to-day affairs of the Palestinians and pay salaries to tens of thousands of employees, while the Islamist movement and its allies continue to smuggle weapons and prepare for the next war with Israel.
Such a scenario would only strengthen Hamas: it would absolve it of it responsibilities toward the residents of Gaza Strip by laying the burden on the Palestinian Authority.
by Shoshana Bryen
Both the president and Mr. Kerry took pains to sever ISIS from the religion of Islam. But ISIS speaks precisely in Islamic terms and holds itself out to be authentic Islam.
The goals of Hamas and the goals of ISIS, to create a society on its own principles -- "ugly, savage, inexplicable, nihilistic and valueless evil," to quote Mr. Kerry -- are the same.
by Alan M. Dershowitz