"Different and Threatening": Most Germans See Islam as a Threat
Muslim men in Germany take advantage of the social welfare system by bringing two, three, four women from across the Muslim world and then marrying them in front of an imam. Although polygamous marriages are not officially recognized -- and are technically illegal and punishable by fines and imprisonment -- government agencies are reluctant to take action. Once in Germany, the women request social welfare benefits, including the cost of a separate home for themselves and their children, on the claim of being a "single parent with children." Cracking down on state-funded polygamy may be bad politics.
More than half of all Germans view Islam as a threat to their country and believe it does not belong in the Western world, according to a major new study on religious attitudes in Germany.
The findings confirm the results of dozens of other surveys, and reflect a growing divide between the views of ordinary Germans and those of Europe's multicultural elites, who, in the quest for "diversity," have been promoting mass immigration from Muslim countries for decades.
The study, entitled, Religion Monitor 2013: Religiousness and Cohesion in Germany (currently available only in German) was produced by the Bertelsmann Foundation, one of the most influential think tanks and lobbying groups in Europe, and a strong proponent of "progressive" causes such as multiculturalism and global governance.
According to the survey -- designed to measure the "most important forms and intensity of the religiosity" of German citizens -- the majority of Germans view Islam as "foreign, different and threatening."
More specifically, 51% of Germans believe Islam poses a threat to their way of life. In East Germany that figure rises to 57%, while in West Germany it reaches 49%. (The survey also shows that one in five Germans believe Judaism poses a threat to the German way of life.)
Only 25% of Germans believe that Islam has a positive influence on German society.
Although 85% Germans say that society should be open to all religions, and 67% believe that "every religion has a core of truth," fully 50% of Germans believe that Islam does not belong to Germany.
The survey also shows that Muslims possess the strongest religious identity in Germany. Some 90% of Muslims believe that religion is somewhat or very important, 40% rate themselves as very religious, and 30% of Muslims visit the mosque on a regular basis. By contrast, only 18% of Protestant Christians attend church on a regular basis.
According to the survey, nearly 40% of Muslims in Germany believe Islam "has a monopoly on the truth" and that other religions are patently false. The poll shows that nearly 20% of Muslims in Germany believe that "only politicians who believe in God are suitable for public office." More than 30% of Muslims believe that Muslim religious leaders should have more influence on government decision-making.
Although 80% of Muslims in Germany say they believe "democracy is a good form of government," the survey also shows that only 24% of Muslims are involved in civil society activities outside of work and family. Bertelsmann explains the statistical disconnect in this way: "The strong collective attachment to family, which prioritizes family relationships over civil society activities, probably plays a role."
The survey results are undeniably bad news for multiculturalists, who are now busy casting the blame for "Islamophobia" on German ignorance and portraying Muslim immigrants as victims of "negative stereotypes."
Bertelsmann claims that the Germans who are most concerned about Islam are "the elderly and those with low levels of education," although the report offers no convincing empirical evidence to support this claim.
In an interview with the international broadcaster Deutsche Welle, Detlaff Pollack, a sociologist who co-authored the Bertelsmann study, tries to downplay the negative perception of Muslims in Germany by claiming that it could be due to the lack of personal contact between Germans and Muslims. In other words, if Germans would only make the effort to meet Muslims they would like what they encounter.
Pollack's explanation seems inadequate, however, given that the Bertelsmann study shows that Germans have overwhelmingly positive views of Buddhism and Hinduism, although most Germans have presumably never met a Buddhist or a Hindu, who make up only 0.3% and 0.1% of the German population, respectively.
In a separate interview with Deutsche Welle, Stephan Vopel, the other co-author of the Bertelsmann study, says: "Certainly education is a very important key for it [tolerance of Islam]. Secondly, we have found that there is a high correlation between the question, have you ever had contact with people of other religions, and attitudes towards other religions. This means that people of different religions must enter into dialogue with each other, need to interact with each other."
But Vopel undermines his own argument by admitting that there already is a considerable amount of interaction between Germans and Muslims. He says: "Here in Germany -- even in comparison with other European countries -- it is not so bad. Here we do not have as strong a ghettoization, segregation in the neighborhoods, as in some other countries."
Rather than asking Muslims to take responsibility for their "image problem" by making a greater effort to integrate into German society, Vopel says that what is needed is more "Islamic religion classes in public schools" so that Germans can become better educated about Islam.
In trying to explain the "frightening" survey results, the pollsters at Bertelsmann apparently cannot get themselves to admit that the poll numbers might reflect reality: Maybe Germans have interacted with Muslims and simply do not like what they see.
Consider the problem of state-funded polygamy in Germany, as reported in a television news broadcast on RTL Extra on April 29, just one day after the Bertelsmann study was released. (The RTL Group is the one of the largest media conglomerates in Europe and is owned by the very same Bertelsmann that is wondering why Germans are "Islamophobic.")
The RTL Extra report (a 23-minute video of the RTL report can be viewed at YouTube here) explains how Muslim polygamists are being financially supported by German taxpayers.
The RTL report shows how Muslim men residing in Germany are taking advantage of the social welfare system by bringing two, three or four women from across the Muslim world to Germany, and then marrying them in the presence of an imam [Muslim religious leader].
Although these polygamous marriages are not officially recognized by the German state -- they are technically illegal and punishable by fines and imprisonment -- the practice is commonplace among Muslims in all major German cities. In Berlin, for example, it is estimated that fully one-third of the Muslim men living in the Neukölln district of the city have two or more wives.
Once in Germany the women request social welfare benefits, including the cost of a separate home for themselves and for their children, on the claim of being a "single parent with children."
The RTL report says that even though the welfare fraud committed by Muslim immigrants is an "open secret" costing German taxpayers millions of euros each year, government agencies are reluctant to take action.
Cracking down on state-funded polygamy may be bad politics. Muslims have emerged as a major voting bloc in German politics, and the mainstream parties are bending over backwards to cater to them ahead of federal elections set for September 22.
Germany's opposition Social Democrats (SPD) are aggressively courting Muslim voters in a desperate bid to unseat German Chancellor Angela Merkel.
Peer Steinbrück, for example, the 66-year-old chancellor candidate for the center-left SPD, said at a campaign stop in Berlin on April 3 that he supported the idea that, as a courtesy to Muslims, physical education classes in German schools should be divided by gender.
Steinbrück was borrowing a page from the playbook of neighboring France, where Muslims determined the outcome of the presidential elections in May 2012, and thrust François Hollande and his Socialist Party into office.
Initially, the ruling center-right Christian Democrats (CDU) expressed outrage at Steinbrück's regressive proposal: a party spokesperson said that "children and parents have to get used to the fact that genders here grow up together and live with the same rights."
Since then, however, the CDU has been changing its tune. As reported by the German newspaper Die Zeit on April 30, the CDU is now actively pursuing Muslim voters, who may end up determining who will become the next chancellor of Germany.
Speaking at a ceremony marking the 60th anniversary of the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) in Nürnberg on April 10, Merkel called on Germans to show respect for Muslim immigrants. She said: "It is not enough to be a country with a high rate of migration, but we must also become a country of integration."
Merkel added: "For many immigrants, the stay in Germany is not a temporary phenomenon, as we sometimes believed, but a permanent reality."
Her words are in stark contrast to October 2010, when Merkel said that multiculturalism has "failed utterly," and November 2010, when the CDU passed a resolution stressing that Germany's cultural identity (Leitkultur) is based on the "Christian-Jewish tradition, ancient and Enlightenment philosophy and the nation's historical experience."
The CDU estimates that Germany is now home to 16 million people with immigrant backgrounds, out of which up to 5.6 million are eligible to vote in September.
The CDU is now actively fielding Muslim candidates. The party has especially high hopes for Cemile Giousouf, a 34-year-old enthnic Turkish woman who will compete as a parliamentary candidate in the constituency of Hagen, a city in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia that is home to one of the largest Muslim communities in Germany. If Giousouf wins, she would be the first ethnic Turkish MP of the CDU in the region.
The Chairman of the German-Turkish Forum in the CDU, Bülent Arslan, sums it up this way: "To win the sympathies of the people [Muslim immigrants], the CDU needs more ethnic Turkish MPs."
Soeren Kern is a Senior Fellow at the New York-based Gatestone Institute. He is also Senior Fellow for European Politics at the Madrid-based Grupo de Estudios Estratégicos / Strategic Studies Group. Follow him on Facebook.
Reader comments on this item
|Bias [57 words]||Raga Gaga||May 27, 2014 11:02|
|Vote bank.. the biggest political reason for Muslim pandering in most countries [95 words]||Sunny||May 8, 2013 13:13|
|Islam in Europe [234 words]||Amakant||May 7, 2013 09:30|
|↔ And it begins again [89 words]||Madghost||Jun 11, 2013 19:29|
|Threat [18 words]||Mikeh420||May 5, 2013 16:27|
|Most Germans See Islam as a Threat [73 words]||Will Knutsen||May 3, 2013 13:42|
|↔ Respect has to be earned. [221 words]||Valhalla||May 4, 2013 06:50|
Comment on this item
by Alan M. Dershowitz
by Pierre Rehov
For terrorists, the death of innocent children is irrelevant. In a society that promotes martyrdom as the ultimate sign of success, the death of innocent children can sometimes even be seen as a public relations blessing.
In every action, intent is paramount. There should never be a moral equivalence painted between the deliberate killing of civilians, and a retaliation that tragically leads to casualties among civilians.
There is, however, one small difference: in the Middle East, reporters are threatened, except in Israel. Their choice becomes a simple one: promote the Palestinian point of view or stop working in the West Bank. Keep the eye of the camera dirty or lose your job. This show should not go on.
by Khaled Abu Toameh
Since 1948, the Arab countries and government have been paying mostly lip service to the Palestinians.
"They have money and oil, but don't care about the Palestinians, even though we are Arabs and Muslims like them. What a Saudi or Qatari sheikh spends in one night in London, Paris or Las Vegas could solve the problem of tens of thousands of Palestinians." — Palestinian human rights activist.
"Some Arabs were hoping that Israel would rid them of Hamas." — Ashraf Salameh, Gaza City.
"Some of the Arab regimes are interested in getting rid of the resistance in order to remove the burden of the Palestinian cause, which threatens the stability of their regimes." — Mustafa al-Sawwaf, Palestinian political analyst.
"Most Arabs are busy these days with bloody battles waged by their leaders, who are struggling to survive. These battles are raging in Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Egypt, Libya and the Palestinian Authority." — Mohammed al-Musafer, columnist.
"The Arab leaders don't know what they want from the Gaza Strip. They don't even know what they want from Israel." — Yusef Rizka, Hamas official.
by Soeren Kern
European elites, who take pride in viewing the EU as a "postmodern" superpower, have long argued that military hard-power is illegitimate in the 21st century. Unfortunately for Europe, Russia (along with China and Iran) has not embraced the EU's fantastical soft-power worldview, in which "climate change" is now said to pose the greatest threat to European security.
For its part, the European Commission, the EU's administrative branch, which never misses an opportunity to boycott institutions in Israel, has issued only a standard statement on the shooting down of MH17 in Ukraine, which reads: "The European Union will continue to follow this issue very closely."
The EU has made only half-hearted attempts to develop alternatives to its dependency on Russian oil and gas.
by Shoshana Bryen
Proportionality in international law is not about equality of death or civilian suffering, or even about [equality of] firepower. Proportionality weighs the necessity of a military action against suffering that the action might cause to enemy civilians in the vicinity.
"Under international humanitarian law and the Rome Statute, the death of civilians during an armed conflict, no matter how grave and regrettable does not constitute a war crime.... even when it is known that some civilian deaths or injuries will occur. A crime occurs if there is an intentional attack directed against civilians (principle of distinction) or an attack is launched on a military objective in the knowledge that the incidental civilian injuries would be clearly excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage (principle of proportionality)." — Luis Moreno-Ocampo, Chief Prosecutor, International Criminal Court.
"The greater the military advantage anticipated, the larger the amount of collateral damage -- often civilian casualties -- which will be "justified" and "necessary." — Dr. Françoise Hampton, University of Essex, UK.